[Editor's note: You should read this site. You are wrong in every statement. Epic Fail!]

Actually Troy, there are many things better. Check out the USDA ORAC Table of Selected Foods – 2007. You’ll find dozens of fruits, vegetables and other foods with a much higher antioxidant capacity than MonaVie. This would include apples, plums, cherries, filberts, blueberries, elderberries, babyfood, peanut butter, and many more.

Hmmm…what could possibly be better that a $45 bottle of nutritionally-void low-grade fruit syrups with sodium benzoate. How about anything, jackass! Two swigs of Welch’s grape juice or a few bites of an apple provide as much nutrition as 2 ounces of Monavie for about 1/50th the price.

Troy said: “Which company do you work for, or do you? I’m sure I can find bad things about the company you work for, or however you make your money.”

I’m sure you can’t, but knock yourself out Troy. Find some “bad things” and then get back to us, jackass!

Troy said: “And what about the people that actively run the site? Could it possibly be funded by MonaVie competitors? Maybe?”

That’s dickish of you to say. Not only is it an unfounded personal attack and a distraction from the “debate”, it’s not even remotely plausible. You should at least have enough guts to be specific in your accusation. Do you think that Welch’s grape juice or V8 is your competitor? They probably each sell more juice in a single day then Monavie does in a year. Eradicating Monavie wouldn’t affect their market share one iota. Your only direct competitors are other MLMs selling snakekoil juices, and our criticisms of Monavie presumably apply equally well to them.

Troy: “So tell us what we should buy, and the findings you’ve found about that product. Only then could we have a proper debate.”

We’ve already put those facts on the table, but you know that already; you’re just pretending that they don’t exist. A proper debate is based on putting facts on the table and then discussing them, not ranting about TV sets and asking us loaded questions about who we work for. Your product is essentially nutritionally valueless compared to a few ounces of just about any juice, fragment of fresh fruit, or 10-cent supplement. We’ve provided more than ample evidence to prove it.

And before you come back crying like a baby about how I called you a JACKASS, bear in mind that it was you who made the unwarranted accusations about us working for some big “bad” company and that we are Monavie’s competitors. That’s not what honest debaters do; but it is the consistent M.O. of dishonest jackass Monavie distributors.

“While you’ve been researching for 2 years, someone has been making money….”

BINGO!! And it hasn’t been you or the majority of MonaVie distributors. It’s been the very elite who made backdoor deals with Dallin Larsen, or raided their existing LOS in other MLMs, and brought them into MonaVie. It isn’t you, it won’t be you, but you will continue to make money for those elite less than 1% of the upper level of the MonaVie pyramid.

Go look at the IDS again, and speaking of that…where is your distributor ID number and the necessary link to the MonaVie IDS which is required by your distributor contract you signed with MonaVie?

Most of your questions can be answered here: http://www.juicescam.com/about/. If you can’t find all your answers there, I suggest you poke around the site for a bit. They have been addressed in the comments from others who have asked similar questions previously.

Which company do you work for, or do you? I’m sure I can find bad things about the company you work for, or however you make your money. Will that change anything for you, if I find that? When you point your finger at someone, there are 4 that are pointing at you. I might ask the founder of this site where is he getting money to fund this site, or is it his/her contribution to society? And what about the people that actively run the site? Could it possibly be funded by MonaVie competitors? Maybe?

If there is something better, tell us (we only want the best). If you don’t have anything better to offer, then your opinion doesn’t mean much. But it better have the scientific backings that you so purposefully try to find that would go against MonaVie. I’ve got something to tell you. While you’ve been researching for 2 years, someone has been making money, and someone has been feeling healthier, regardless of if there’s something better, and you can’t say to someone that has made money and has had health benefits that it’s not working, regardless of cost. I personally don’t get why people are buying 50″ LCD high def TVs, or whatever the new technology and size is, or 20 some inch computer monitors. Although I can list some reasons why they shouldn’t get it, I have no say on what they do with their time and money.

So tell us what we should buy, and the findings you’ve found about that product. Only then could we have a proper debate.