MonaVie vs. Sambazon

87
Comments

(…or How a Distributor Fixes the Competition)

I just finished reading this “side by side” comparison of MonaVie and Sambazon. After comparing the process behind the products, he concludes they are similar. He then states that a bottle of Sambazon is $2.99 while a bottle of MonaVie is $39.99 or more. Sounds like the MonaVie distributor is going to go with the sane choice and say that MonaVie is out-matched.

Of course the author doesn’t do this. He compares the cost per serving. There is where the logic falls apart. A true side by side comparison would be to compare the cost of MonaVie per ounce vs. the cost of Sambazon per ounce. You end up getting just an ounce of MonaVie for the $1.80/serving… but you get nearly the whole bottle in Sambazon’s $2.30/serving. So rather than congratulate Sambazon for using serving sizes that people actually drink, he twists it into some kind of negative. When you break it down ounce for ounce, the Sambazon becomes $0.29/ounce vs. MonaVie’s $1.80/ounce (plus shipping). It’s not close is it?

He then goes on to say:

No matter how much Sambazon I drink and no matter how many people I tell about Sambazon, I will never get paid to drink it.

That’s one of the very odd statements you’ll hear MonaVie distributors say. When you look at the MonaVie Income Disclosure Statement, you’ll note that 82% of the people (Distributor and Star level) who are actively trying to sell the juice, end up having to work 500 hours a year to break even on the $1500 of juice they drink. Do if you actively working the business, and you better than 82% of the people also working the business, you may get free juice for a year by donating 500 hours of your time. By the way, 500 hours is 31 days at 16 hours each. Yes, it’s a month of your life working 16 hour days for “free” juice. Another way to look at it is two months of your life working standard 8 hours of your life for “free” juice. That’s spending 1/6th of your yearly work life for “free” juice.

The other factor that I liked about MonaVie is the fact that you can have it automatically delivered to your doorstep every month.

MonaVie offers free shipping? Of course not. You have to pay for that, but with Sambazon, I just put it in my cart as I’m already at the store buying milk and other staples. The shipping cost of MonaVie is another negative.

MonaVie is 100% juice, there is no water and the juice in MonaVie Active and Pulse is not from concentrate. Only 1 of Sambazon’s drinks is 100% juice and they all contain water and juice from concentrate.

It’s completely unclear how MonaVie can add something freeze-dried without reconstituting it with water. It simply doesn’t make sense. Also since Sambazon is 1/6th the price of MonaVie, as long as it has more than 16.6% juice, you are getting more juice for your money. It’s simple math… You can get one ounce of 100% juice at $1.80 with MonaVie – or 6 ounces of Sambazon’s 80% juice (equal to 4.8 ounces of MonaVie’s 100%) for the same price. You still get nearly 5 times more for your dollar. That was the lowest amount of juice as Sambazon also had a 95% juice and a 100% juice option.

The sugar per serving for Sambazon is: 20g for Supergreens Revolution, 21g for Antioxidant Trinity and 30g for Strawberry Samba. The sugar per serving for MonaVie is: 3g for MonaVie Original, 3g for MonaVie Active and 7g for MonaVie Pulse.

More “serving size” trickery. Sambazon’s serving size is 8 ounces, so it’s sugar is actually less than MonaVie’s. It’s another example of false – “side by side” comparison. There’s more to it though as he goes into calories a serving and fat a serving. Again, you are getting 1/8th the amount of juice with MonaVie, so you should expect 1/8th the calories and 1/8 the fat.

My favorite source of lies was this one though…

Q: What is the ORAC score for your product?

A: Sambazon.com: One of our Acai smoothies or juices (10.4 fl oz.) have anywhere from 5,000- 15,000 ORAC units.
Monavie.com: Four ounces of MonaVie has an approximate ORAC value of 4,000 to 5,000 units. This is the approximate ORAC value of 5 to 13 commonly eaten fruits and vegetables. Health experts currently recommend consuming 5,000 ORAC units per day for optimal antioxidant protection.
***SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON*** If you break down the ORAC unit scores per oz. Sambazon smoothies or juices have between 481 to 1442 units per ounce and MonaVie has between 1000 to 1250 units per ounce.

We already determined that MonaVie is clearly lying when it says it’s approximately 4000-5000 ORAC units. This is a big advantage for Sambazon.

So the real side-by-side comparison:
Sambazon: 481 to 1442 ORAC units/ounce (average is 961.5 ORAC)
MonaVie: 672.6 ORAC units/ounce

Sambazon Cost/ounce: $0.29
MonaVie Cost/ounce: $1.80

So for 1/6th the price, you can get what is likely to be 30% more ORAC.

The above article is intended to be accurate at the time of its original posting. MonaVie may change its pricing, product, or other policies at any time without notice.

This post involves:

, ,

... and focuses on:

MonaVie vs. Sambazon

Posted by MonaVie Scam on February 28, 2011 in MonaVie vs. Sambazon. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

87 Responses to “MonaVie vs. Sambazon”
  1. Cyberxion Says:

    I find it amusing that Monavie distributors often point to the fact that they get paid to drink it as a positive thing, apparently unaware of how it looks to the rest of us.

    See, we can’t exactly take your glowing praise of the product at face value, given the glaring conflict of interest involved in being both a distributor and a drinker of Monavie. That sort isn’t exactly the most trustworthy, you know?

  2. Mali Says:

    how come you don’t comment his and link to yours or at least let him know his errors in his computations?

  3. MonaVie Scam Says:

    I don’t like to promote my articles on other websites. I don’t want people to think that I’m trying to spam his “pro-MonaVie” site with my “anti-MonaVie” stance.

    He didn’t have a contact form or button that I could see either.

  4. Fred Says:

    There’s always someone out there trying to bash the (per Inc. 500) #18 fastest growing privately held company in the United States. #1 in the Food and Beverage Category, and #3 in overall revenue.

    No network marketing compant has ever even been on the Inc. 500 list.

    The product is legit, the company is legit, and no other “Acai” beverage can touch it right now. It’s not even close.

    Those are the facts.

    Let me know when Sambazon shows up at the Academy Awards VIP Lounge or on The Doctors Show, or in the clubhouses/locker rooms of professional sports teams, etc….

    Not everyone gets paid to drink it. In fact, a majority of the people who sign up as distributors or preferred customers aren’t even doing the business. That must mean the PRODUCT IS LEGIT. HELLO!!!!!

    I’m guessing most people in the US spend way more than “500 hours” per year WATCHING TV or doing some other unproductive activity. Turn off your TV people. Stop watching the BS! Get healthy and make a difference.

  5. MonaVie Scam Says:

    You might want to read this post about the Inc. 500 list – http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-and-inc-magazines-500/. It’s a pretty arbitrary list of qualifications and almost all the other companies in list are not ones that anyone has heard of.

    What kind of fact is “product is legit, the company is legit, and no other ‘Acai’ beverage can touch it right now.” That is all opinion.

    MonaVie didn’t “show up” at the Academy Awards VIP Lounge. They paid for the privilege. Same with the locker rooms of professionsal sports teams. Sambazon could have done the same, but they choose substance over the glitz. Perhaps that is why they don’t need to retail the product at $45.

    Did you tell people to stop watching television at the same time you give MonaVie credit for being on The Doctors Show? Wow. I think everyone is entitled to their own form of entertainment. All work and no play makes Johnnie a dull boy, right.

    You managed to not give a single reason why the product is “legit”, but you did use the word legit a number of times. Good job!

  6. Fred Says:

    http://www.aibmr.com/resources/articles-and-reports.php

    Let me know when Sambazon’s research gets published in peer reviewed scientific journals.

    And if you’re going to watch TV, you might as well watch something educational, right?

    Scam, you can get a bottle of Monavie for as little as approx $20-$22

    Sambazon is the team drink of which professional team?

  7. MonaVie Scam Says:

    Let me know when the AIBMR research shows that the juice is has value. When you read the study, it becomes clear that it’s not special in any way. Being published in a peer-reviewed journal is only a good thing, if the study is helpful to the juice.

    Here is your Sambazon study – http://www.bevnet.com/news/2010/2-1-2010-Sambazon_announces_results_of_acai_study. It’s probably too new to make the journals yet.

    Yes, MonaVie can be had for $20-22 if you buy it in huge bulk (I think a distributor quoted it as a 6-month supply costing me some $500+). Even with the bulk purchase (a big negative for MonaVie), Sambazon is still about 1/3 the price.

    Sambazon chooses not to pay to sponsor a team. The savings go to the customer. Perhaps MonaVie shouldn’t be paying to be the team drink of a professional team and pass those savings on to the customer as well.

    Let me know when MonaVie is certified organic like Sambazon.

  8. Fred Says:

    Paying for publicity is never a bad thing, right? ;)

  9. Fred Says:

    Unless of course it’s bad publicity. :D

  10. MonaVie Scam Says:

    And that’s what MonaVie paid for when they commissioned AIBMR to research it. :-)

    I don’t think paying for publicity is a bad thing, but it’s not a good thing either. I doesn’t mean MonaVie is better than any other juice.

  11. Fred Says:

    “Let me know when the AIBMR research shows that the juice is has value.”

    I challenge you to go back and read the studies objectively and find language that shows the juice has value. I know that may sound like an odd request (given your pro-Sambazon bias, but give it try. I guarantee you it’s there.

    and then…

    Show me the link to Sambazon’s research published in a Peer Reviewed Scientific Journal.

  12. MonaVie Scam Says:

    I couldn’t find anything in the AIBMR studies that compared MonaVie to any other juice. It is expected that juice is good for you. Outstandingly high performance is required to justify MonaVie’s outstandingly high price. Where are MonaVie’s comparisons to other juices so that we can judge that performance? It’s like me asking you to choose car A or car B without telling anything about the cars other than the price. Sorry, I’m going to take the lower priced every time.

    MonaVie’s website touts ORAC score as being an important measure of the value of it’s juice. Sambazon’s ORAC is higher and it’s cheaper. In fact an apple is better than 9 ounces of MonaVie: http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-vs-an-apple/. Why don’t you mention that? Again, MonaVie isn’t certified organic.

    Also, I don’t believe the AIBMR studies are peer-reviewed. There are studies in The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, but I don’t think they were done by AIBMR. Please tell me which journal article you want me to review and I will do so. Also please provide me a link to that article so that I can review it. (Linking to: http://www.aibmr.com/resources/articles-and-reports.php doesn’t count, as the articles are not there.)

  13. Fred Says:

    I want you to read all of them.

    Here’s a little teaser from one:

    “MonaVie Active has not only shown experimentally to increase antioxidant activity in human serum, leading to a decrease in lipid peroxidation in the blood stream, but there is also evidence that MonaVie Active provided antioxidants that are able to penetrate cells. This study confirms that by drinking four ounces of MonaVie Active containing Brazilian acai berry, the subjects had a significant increase in their antioxidant capacity and inhibition in lipid peroxidation, which reduces the risk of cholesterol being oxidized. Oxidized cholesterol has been shown to contribute to damage to the internal lining of the arteries.”

  14. MonaVie Scam Says:

    I have read all them. The one you mention sounds a little like the one here: http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/sample.cgi/jafcau/2008/56/i18/pdf/jf8016157.pdf (PDF file). I have pointed out how badly done that study was in comment 974 here: http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monaVieArchive.php. So you don’t have to go there here’s what I said:

    Looking at the study, here are the things I have issue with:

    - Study: “one was excluded on the basis of a high daily antioxidant intake”
    My Response: Hmmm, so if I’m already healthy, or perhaps take a daily multivitamin, the study is irrelevant to me. Let’s go back to what I wrote months ago in the original post: “However, [another study] doesn�t compare to less costly solutions, like a multivitamin, V8 juice, or just a handful of mixed berries. I�m putting the burden of proof on MonaVie to show that their juice deserves the premium over the mixed berries.” Seems like the study fails to comparison to the less costly solution.

    - Study: “Because the ORAC testing did not result in a trend toward increased antioxidant activity, it was not used in the subsequent randomized controlled trial.”
    My Response: Hmmm, does this mean that pages and pages of people professing ORAC as the “end-all”, it’s really not a good measure in the real world? What good is it then? I’m not a scientist, so I may have read this part wrong, but this is my interpretation of what I did read.

    - Study: “Thus, the analysis of the pilot study was based on five study participants from whom repeat blood draws were performed.”
    My Response: Five people… not exactly a wide-spread study, right?

    - Study: “The study participants were instructed to avoid vigorous exercise for a period of 24 h prior to arriving at the clinic. They were also instructed to eat a light meal and to avoid meat, fruits, or greens, as well as to abstain from consuming alcohol, coffee, or melatonin the night before. Subjects were scheduled to arrive at the clinic following an overnight fast and were instructed to consume no food, vitamins, or other nutritional supplements the morning of each study day.”
    My Response: Hmmm, so you couldn’t exercise, eat things like fruit or greens that contain antioxidants, or take vitamins. Alcohol and coffee in moderation also have antioxidant properties, so they were eliminated. In short, they are letting one group have fruit (I think that almost everyone agrees that MonaVie is fruit) and another not. I don’t know what they were expecting, but it’s not necessary a win for MonaVie – just fruit in general. If they want to prove MonaVie worthwhile have both groups eat equal amounts of fruit and one with MonaVie. See which comes out better.

    - Study: “A recent study assessed the increase in plasma antioxidant capacity after the consumption of either an antioxidant-poor meal or the same antioxidant-poor meal with the addition of a known quantity of whole fruits added (8). This study showed that the consumption of an antioxidant-poor meal results in a decrease in plasma antioxidant capacity and that adding fruits to the same meal not only prevented this decrease but also led to an increase in antioxidant capacity.”
    My Response: So they are just proving what they already knew – fruit is good for you. So avoid antioxidant-poor meals and add some fruits and greens to your diet.

    They aren’t proving that MonaVie is better is than other juices or fruit. They are just proving that MonaVie is like fruit. You know what else is like fruit? Fruit.

  15. Fred Says:

    And where’s the research on Sambazon?

    Monavie: 1

    Sambazon: 0

  16. Fred Says:

    Why not publish a critical analysis in the JAFC? Then you could say you yourself had a study/analysis posted in a peer reviewed scientific journal.

    This blog carries no weight.

  17. MonaVie Scam Says:

    I linked you the research before: http://www.bevnet.com/news/2010/2-1-2010-Sambazon_announces_results_of_acai_study

    Again no response to Sambazon being certified organic and MonaVie not. Looks like MonaVie loses again.

  18. MonaVie Scam Says:

    I have no interest in going through whatever process it is to get an article published in the JAFC. I’m already published here. More people can find this information by searching Google where as the JAFC, doesn’t come up very high.

    I don’t know what you mean by “This blog carries no weight.” I only put information out there for people to read. I strive to make sure that information is accurate. That’s an important thing, because MonaVie distributors are spreading inaccurate information. If you read this article you could easily see the mistakes that the other MonaVie website made. Anyone can come here and use site to research MonaVie. For instance, people may not have realized that they can buy a juice (Sambazon) with 30% more ORAC at 1/6th the price of MonaVie.

  19. Vogel Says:

    I didn’t know about that Sambazon study. Good find LM. You’re right; it doesn’t seem to have been published yet. But while I was looking on PubMed I found an interesting acai juice study, published in the journal “Appetite” last year, entitled “Effect of a health claim and personal characteristics on consumer acceptance of fruit juices with different concentrations of açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.)”.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19467277

    Essentially, the study showed that when acai-related health claims were relayed to consumers (particularly those who didn’t initially like or intend to buy acai juice), it made them more inclined to like acai juice, perceive it as having value, and to buy it. This was a somewhat intuitive result, but an interesting one nonetheless. Another interesting finding was that older subjects and women were most likely to accept fruit juices for which particular health benefits were claimed. This seems consistent with Monavie’s target demographic, which predominantly consists of women and elderly/retirees.

    I found another interesting article published recently by the Brazilian Ministry of Health indicating that Chagas disease (a very serious health problem in South America) can be transmitted orally by consumption of acai fruit.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19331764

    In this study, acai consumption was the suspected cause of 178 cases of Chagas reported in the state of Para, Brazil in 2006. This finding is interesting in light of the fact that Monavie distributors always concoct stories about how acai has been used by the Brazilians as medicine for hundreds of years and they pretend that Monavie is helping to save the rain forest, but they never mention any downsides; eg, Brazilians who consume acai can contract Chagas disease (as can the workers who harvest the berries and are exposed to insect-borne Chagas), and overseas demand for acai is causing prices to escalate beyond the reach of Brazilians who depend on it as a dietary staple (cf. “‘Superfood’ Promoted on Oprah’s Site Robs Amazon Poor of Staple”; Bloomberg News – May 14, 2009).
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=ai8WCgSJrhmY&refer=home

    I also found this article (“What Is the Açaí Berry and Are There Health Benefits?”) written by Wendy Marcason, a registered dietician who works at the American Dietetic Association’s Knowledge Center in Chicago, which was published in late-2009 in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association. The author, who incidentally had reviewed Schauss’ acai study, concluded the following about acai:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19857637

    “Until the health benefits of the açaí berry are scientifically proven, it seems more reasonable, cheaper, and safer to get antioxidants from other fruit and vegetable sources. To get the recommended daily amounts of antioxidants, the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend eating two cups of fruits and two and one half cups of vegetables each day based on a 2,000-calorie-perday diet.”

    Marcason also discussed the online acai berry scams and the legal action that’s been taken to stop them, as well as the lawsuit filed by Oprah et al. (which we all know named Monavie as a co-defendant). She also said “ignore endorsements” and “check out the BBB” (which, as we all know, has variably rated Monavie between an F and a D minus this year).

    Lastly, there’s this article published 2 months ago by the University of California Berkeley. The title says it all – “PONZI BERRY”!
    http://www.berkeleywellnessalerts.com/alerts/dietary_supplements/acai-berries33-1.html

  20. Fred Says:

    LOL at all of that bogus research above.

    And Scam, where is that study published? You could be improving your health, helping others get what they want, and getting what you want. I guess this is the “Big Dream” you’ve chosen to go after. Sad sad sad!!! :(

    Monavie was dropped as a co-defendant in Oprah’s lawsuit. Do your homework!!!

  21. MonaVie Scam Says:

    I am improving my health and helping others. It is you who is defending the sale of $45 juice that is shown to be worse than $4 juice.

  22. Cyberxion Says:

    Bogus research, eh Fred? And Monavie’s completely self-serving research is supposed to hold more weight…why now? Think McFly, think!

    C’mon Fred, give it a rest already. More and more, people are coming around to the Monavie lie. Your customer base is already dwindling before your eyes, and it’s just a matter of time before the FDA comes a-knocking, asking Monavie why it continues to allow its distributors monkeys to toss atypical anecdotes about the juice’s alleged health benefits all about the internet like so much textual feces, and you’ll be shut down with nothing to show for your psychotic devotion to the Monavie cult but wasted time and wasted money.

    It might not happen today, it might not happen six months from now, but it will happen. Delve into the history of some of Monavie’s biggest players and you’ll see how a similar scam went down not too long ago. This will end the same way, you can count on it.

    So hey, take some of your advice and stop wasting your time. This is a losing battle. No matter what you say, or how smug and dismissive you act in the face of it, the truth will catch up to you people in the end.

    People just aren’t as stupid as you folks are banking on them to be. Stop insulting us with this bullcrap and grow the hell up already.

  23. Fred Says:

    Stop wasting your time here folks.

    This is a toxic website filled with nothing but hate, lies, and misinformation.

    Go after your dreams. Be positive in life because what you focus on expands.

    The negativity here is tragic!

    I’ll take my bottle of Monavie, PUBLISHED research, better health physically, financially, emotionally, and spiritually and go on my merry way. May you all (you too scam) find peace and happiness somewhere in your lives.

    I’m out!

    It’s SIMPLE It’s FUN It’s MONAVIEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

    Yea Baby!!!!!!

  24. Candace Says:

    MonaVie Scam, That was a great article about Sambazon, thank you!

    Vogel, I enjoyed the “Ponzi Berry” article, and your links to other research. The Chagas thing is a bit concerning.

    Fred, Nice rebuttal…

    “LOL at all of that bogus research above.

    You haven’t provided one shred of proof to back up your position! Nothing…It’s such typical MonaVie proponent behavior that it’s now just laughable and expected. Can you provide proof for anything you’ve stated here? Can you show us where and when Oprah dropped the lawsuit against MonaVie?

  25. Vogel Says:

    Fred, please hop back in you playpen, take a big suck on your acai-juice box, and let the adults talk.

    I couldn’t find any news on Google to confirm Fred’s claim that Monavie had been dropped as a defendant in the Oprah lawsuit. I did, however, find this interesting article on the subject posted on this website. I was particularly struck by this quote:

    “Network marketing companies will always be held accountable for the actions of their sales force, regardless if the company condones the behavior or not.”
    http://www.nextgenerationlaw.com/oprahs-lawsuit-serves-as-a-strong-reminder/

    If that’s the case (as it appears to be), the company will have a lot of atoning to do for Fred’s loathsome behavior, not to mention a litany of graver sins.

  26. Fred Says:

    Just a few things before I officially “go on my merry way.”

    Hopefully you all will find the time to find your real calling (I’m hoping what you’ve written here is not it).

    The great thing about Monavie is not the money, or that it is helping so many people…it’s the “relationships” and personal growth you experience when you try to help yourself and others. I’ve met and reconnected with so many wonderful people since I’ve jumped into Monavie. It has taken me from the comfort of Ordinary into a place where Dreams can happen.

    If Monavie is not the company for you, I hope you all find something that will take you to a place where you are helping others, believing in yourself, and making your dreams happen.

    Good luck to all of you.

    Focus on the POSITIVE and you will be REWARDED….Focus on the negative and you will wallow in misery and misfortune for the rest of your lives.

    POSITIVE POSITIVE POSITIVE!!!!!

    Fred

  27. Food Tech in CA Says:

    The reincarnation of Jim Jones

  28. Candace Says:

    Jacked on the juice.

  29. Cyberxion Says:

    I do focus on the positive, Fred. I’m positive that Monavie is a scam at the price, I’m positive that you and yours try to justify that price with potentially deadly lies, and I’m positive that you and the rest of the soulless denizens of the Monavie pyramid will get yours in the end.

    How’s that for positive thinking?

  30. MonaVie Scam Says:

    Vogel found this piece of research,

    “Network marketing companies will always be held accountable for the actions of their sales force, regardless if the company condones the behavior or not.
    (Source)

    I read that article and found out something interesting… from the article:

    “In general, [the plantiffs - Harpo productions] reference credit card fraud, fraudulent use of meta tagging for search engine optimization (which is way over my head), and unauthorized use of copyrighted works.”

    The bolded part above is interesting to me because MonaVie lawyers used the same tactic on me. Of course I showed various precident that got them to back away. (I not-so-humbly suggest that I know more law than MonaVie’s lawyers… and I’m not a lawyer). Plus, I’m offering commentary on MonaVie, which gives me the right to use MonaVie’s trademark (it’s impossible not to) in my writing. A person trying to sell MonaVie stands on much more shaky ground when he/she brings in a completely unrelated trademark (Oprah) with the purpose of selling a product.

    I’d like to point out that I said what this lawyer did many, many months ago when I compared MonaVie to Napster. http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-is-the-next-napster/

  31. Je Says:

    I have a friend that has recently been “invited” into this monavie nonsense. He’s really excited about it. I’m trying to gather a bit of research before he ends up dropping a lot of money on something with a proven history of letting its distributors fail.

    More likely than not, the market for people gullible enough to drink 40 dollar bottles of juice (I don’t even like to spend that much on wine!!) has collapsed along with the loosey goosey financing credit standards of a few years back.

    Fred’s been coached well. MLM salesmen are very much like politicians and scientologists. They’re spin doctors. It’s really kind of fun to watch. Too bad many are willing to take the bait.

    So, really, thanks for the site. I’m hoping it turns out well for my friend.

  32. Cooper Simon/John Feldow Says:

    Je, First people only fail if they quit and many people do very very quickly one because they get beat up on the perception of this type of business from family and friends. Two because they come to sites like this and get discouraged…………

    He can only fail if he quits if he sticks with it he can make it happen and he will learn about teamwork and being positive in this business.

    The price of the juice is a can get around $32 dollars a bottle if he buys two cases a month. Also through commissions earned from the Monavie compensation plan he can pay for his juice within the first month and continue to receive his juice for free because of the residual income he will earn.

  33. MonaVie Scam Says:

    Actually Cooper, people fail if they can’t get people to sign up underneath them to support the pyramid. You don’t have to come to this site to get discouraged. MonaVie is already embarrassed by its income disclosure statement.

    I like Cooper’s math. The juice can be $32 a bottle if you buy two cases (8 bottles) a month. That’s $256 a month or more than $3000 a year. Who wouldn’t want to give themselves an instant $5K raise ($3K after taxes) by just not getting involved in it?

  34. Cooper Simon/John Feldow Says:

    While buying a great plethora of different products from Monavie they are also investing into a income opportunity. Again like I stated people can pay for their juice within a month or months and drink their juice at no cost.

    So let me see Apple juice for 4 dollars or Monavie for free with the potential of building a nice part time business for myself that could potentially earn me anywhere from 18k-100k in residual income in my first year if I don’t quit!!!! If I quit I fail if I don’t quit I succeed…………Simple as that

    Why do many people fail to enroll distributors? Because they quit!!!!! Most people can enroll a couple people after a month or two if they don’t they aren’t trying or talking to enough people. They get discouraged say I can’t do this and quit simple as that.

    Monavie is not embarrassed by it’s Income Disclosure according to the rules and regulations Monavie Distributors most show this to disclosure sheet at every meeting. Compared to other Network Marketing companies Monavie is dominating they want to show people the potential of what you can make but at the same time they advise you it takes work! It’s not get rich quick. Please stop posing your opinions as factual………..

  35. Cyberxion Says:

    I’ll make you a deal, Cooper. You stop posting lies as if they’re factual, and then maybe we’ll consider discussing whether or not a scumbag such as yourself deserves the right to make demands of anyone else.

    Basically “Please stop posing your opinions as factual……..” translates into “You’re making it tough for me to do my job effectively, please stop…..”

    You distributors never cease to amuse me.

  36. Cooper Simon/John Feldow Says:

    I’ll make you a deal Cyber…..Speak from experience before you speak out your beehind or stop posting your OPINIONS AS FACTUAL

    Stop posting your opinions as factual means stop scaring off people who could really be helped by the Monavie product and opportunity.

    Ignorant HATERS never cease to amuse me

  37. Vogel Says:

    Keep rambling Cooper. You sound insane…really. With every post, you vivdly demonstrate why people should run for the hills when they hear the word Monavie

  38. Food Tech in CA Says:

    Cooper, if you have any science to back your product, please post. We’ll need citations, of course. Otherwise, the consensus is that it’s nothing more than fruit punch in a slick bottle.

    Anecdotes from unverifiable sources will carry no weight here.

  39. Dan Says:

    Cooper Simon states:
    “If I quit I fail if I don’t quit I succeed…………Simple as that

    Why do many people fail to enroll distributors? Because they quit!!!!! Most people can enroll a couple people after a month or two if they don’t they aren’t trying or talking to enough people. They get discouraged say I can’t do this and quit simple as that.”

    Cooper, my buddy pitched Monavie to me a couple of weeks ago. In his sales pitch were many of the motivational slogans about not giving up and promises of vast wealth and success.

    I declined his request to join. He insisted I listen to some CD’s from Orrin Woodward about Monavie. He promised that it would change my mind overnight. Out of respect for him and our long friendship I promised that I would, and I did listen to them. I have to admit that if I was not a healthy skeptic by nature or was in financial trouble the promises would sound pretty enticing. Of course he was wrong, it did not change my mind. It only convinced me to dig deeper for the truth.

    So I did a bit of research about Mr. Woodward and his associates only to find that he makes money off of motivational speeches and selling “tools” to “build the business.” In reality, they don’t give a damn about your health or your financial future. They’re only out to sell you on the dream. Their job is to keep you motivated to never quit, and keep buying overpriced motivational tools, and stay on auto-ship to line the pockets of those at the top.

    So many distributors come in here taunting the fact that they can drink this juice for free. You can only drink for free if you decide to sell out your friends and family to buy into this. If your relationships with others is worth less than drinking your free juice, then there’s nothing that can be said to help you.

    It boggles the mind to see why someone would make a conscious choice to sell their loved ones down the river for free juice, when they could recommend the lower price product in the article. Remember that Monavie does get their money from somewhere, and there has to be someone at the bottom of the pyramid who will lose everything and gain nothing regardless of how hard they work or how much time they invest.

    I guess it’s all about the pursuit of the almighty dollar, everything else be damned.

  40. MonaVie Scam Says:

    I’ll add that Cooper should keep on trying to be quarterback for the New England Patriots… if he quits that he fails. If he doesn’t quit, does he succeed? Well, after wasting his life he might look back age 70 and realize that he never was quarterback or the New England Patriots. Is that success? I don’t think so.

    Sometimes it’s good to know when to fold them, and when nearly everyone is making minimum wage, well it’s a sign it’s time to not just walk away, but time to run.

  41. Cooper Simon/John Feldow Says:

    Dan,

    You don’t have to buy tools from Orin Woodward to help you in this business that is up to you. I do not purchase any tools from him at all. I have bought product and some information which has been very minimal in cost.

    Either way if you want to pursue this business you treat it like a business. You don’t treat it halfway but you put everything you can into it to succeed.

    Most businesses you are investing over $10,000 in this business you invest less than %2 of that and get started. So it may not feel like a business because of the minimal investment but you better treat it like you did invest $10,000 or else you probably won’t succeed.

    There in lies the problem with many people they think it will be easy so they make their investment to get the juice ask a couple people they say no so they give up. They don’t attend meetings they don’t meet the people making it happen and they stay to themselves and believe it will never work for them. The numbers are skewed in the IDS because they don’t show ones effort and timeframe in the business. That is why experience and really checking out something for yourself is the key.

    I may hear that my friends girlfriend’s friend is ugly and never want to meet her but then I see her and meet her and think she is beautiful inside and out. My perception of the truth blinded me from what was really true.

    So experience it for what it really is not from the outside looking in and then make a proper decision instead of judging from the outside looking in.

    Friends and family drink the juice and enjoy the benefits and some of them are pursuing the business. No one is going for broke and I am not taking advantage of anybody. I have helped certain people achieve more income and I have helped people feel better from drinking the Monavie products. This company does not destroy relationships it only increases them. I have met alot of new people and we work together as a team to grow our business together and we all help each other. I have also been thanked by people who have been helped by the product. You will get some people who say I will come to you if I am interested don’t talk to me about this anymore and you respect their wishes and move on. This business though is ultimately all about building strong relationships with different people some will be family and close friends and some will be people you were introduced through the business.

    Scam,

    Many people don’t have the physical capabilities to become the Patriots QB but as long as your mentally healthy you can achieve great success in any type of Business you pursue as long as you really want it.

    That was a bad comparison but you know what if you can’t enroll two distributors within the first 2 months then maybe this business isn’t for you. Honestly though that would come down to really giving no effort.

    It’s not get rich quick, Monavie advises people of this it takes work and patience and if you give up you will fail that is the bottomline. If you stick with it you will get stronger and overcome obstacles and succeed just like in most walks of life.

  42. Candace Says:

    Cooper Simon/John Feldow (how many screen names do you need?):

    So, in your own words:

    “It’s not get rich quick, Monavie advises people of this it takes work and patience and if you give up you will fail that is the bottomline. If you stick with it you will get stronger and overcome obstacles and succeed just like in most walks of life.”

    Of course MonaVie tells you to stick with it…as they bleed you dry with their required autoship of grossly overprice white grape juice.

    If you “stick with it” and “become stronger” and “overcome obstacles” and “succeed just like in most walks of life”, show us your success. Proof is in the pudding, and without it your words are just vacuous ramblings. Show us how you’ve stuck with it and how you’ve been financially rewarded…show us how you are making more than the guy who got laid off from the airlines and went to work selling cars from 10-8, show us how you have more financial success than he, through MonaVie, as well as more time with your family than he has.

    You won’t because you can’t.

    And kindly adhere to your MonaVie contract and provide your distributor ID number, please.

  43. Vogel Says:

    Want to know how to make it in the Monavie organization Cooper John? You do what Black Diamond executive Jason Lyons did — find a convicted court-martialed rapist like Lou Niles, dress him up in surgical scrubs, have him lie that he is a doctor specializing in treating cancer patients, and then put him in front of an audience of potential recruits to lie about how good Monavie is at treating cancer.

    That is “hard work”. It’s not easy weaving such grand lies.

  44. Vogel Says:

    Cooper/John said: “Most businesses you are investing over $10,000 in this business you invest less than %2 of that and get started. So it may not feel like a business because of the minimal investment but you better treat it like you did invest $10,000 or else you probably won’t succeed.”

    You just jeep pulling statements out of your arse that have no basis in fact. I started my first company when I was 14. My dad co-signed the application for a retail business/vendors license. That allowed me to buy model kits at wholesale prices and I turned around and sold them to stores in my neighborhood for a decent markup. Total investment was probably about $100 and I made a tidy profit for a couple of years. When I got older, I started an S-Corp — total investment was about $1,000 to have my accountant file the articles of incoporation. My gross revenue in the first year of business was about 250 times that.

    Cooper/John said: “You don’t have to buy tools from Orin Woodward to help you in this business that is up to you. I do not purchase any tools from him at all. I have bought product and some information which has been very minimal in cost.”

    We all know that selling tools is the real-end game for the Monavie executives. They reverse engineered this scam by pondering what product they could use to support a sales tools scam, and they came up with Monavie (an unimaginitive redux of Royal Tongan Limu). The shitty juice is an afterthought — a loss leader.

    Have a look at R3Global’s video. This makes it pretty obvious what they’re really selling (in addition to group baptisms in motel swimming pools) and who’s really getting rich as a result — about a dozen Black Diamonds.
    http://www.brighart.com/videogallery.aspx?id=videogallery/WhatIsR3G

    These Black Diamonds did not “build their businesses” in the way that the average Monavie distributor is asked to build the business. They brought existing downlines with them from other companies, and in some cases, were paid to do so or were enticed with a slice of the sales tools pie. So can their “success” really be emulated by the average person? Not unless they can start their own pyramid scheme in which they own the rights to sales tools profits, and if they have an existing downline that they can exploit.

    For any one person who succeeds in Monavie, about 98 people have to fail; this isn’t because they aren’t trying hard enough — it is because they MUST fail (i.e., pour their own time and money into the pyramid) or their upline cannot succeed. Monavie, unlike licit businesses, is a zero-sum game

    And by now Cooper/John, you are aware that you have been busted here for posting under two different user names and trying to create the illusion of strength in numbers. That too attests loudly to the fraudulent nature of the Monavie organization.

    On a closing note, I want everyone to look at the latest product that R3Global is flogging to its distributors: it is the R3G/Monavie money roll band. Do I even need to explain the many levels of irony here — selling a rubber band for $1.25 as a money roll band to people who have no money — because they are wasting it on $1.25 money roll bands.
    http://www.r3global.com/catalog/partdetail.aspx?PartNo=103283

  45. Pearman 7 Says:

    WOWWWWWW

    Vogel, First off Niles was never convicted of rape and just because one guy out of 3 million distributors makes this a bad company? Haha ……..I guess we should stop watching Kobe Byrant as he is a rapist too right? Or Big Ben?

    [Editor's Note: Actually those are two great reasons not to watch the Lakers or Steelers. I've heard lifelong fans of the same teams say the same. However, putting that aside, Niles is reason number #845 that makes MonaVie a bad company. Read the rest of this website for about 80 more and realize that it is 1/10 of what I could post here.]

    Some Women are crazy we know that haha…….V

    So if that guy at your work hits your wife then your whole job is corrupt? Is that the sense your trying to make or are you trying to scare people away with scare tactics.

    [Editor's Note: I don't know about some women being crazy, but it seems like Pearman here is. The company does take a credibility hit when they make that person a spokesman. You clearly have your effect, before your cause in this case.]

    I said Most Business require a substantial investment most ones that you want to turn a nice profit anyway. Looks like your doing great as you waste all your time as a “Expert google searcher” ahahaha…..

    [Editor's Note: Or else maybe Vogel already made all the money he needs and is volunteering his time to provide a valuable public service. Wait, that actually makes sense!]

    Candace I am a couple months into the business and building a fine foundation with a couple key business builders with me.

    [Editor's Note: Pearman 7, since admit to being a distributor, please leave your name and distributor ID as required by MonaVie]

    Selling tools is not the end game dopey ok? It’s just part of it, Brig Hart sells gear that he makes he took the initiative to get it done and he did credit the guy for being a great business man. Like Russel Simmons record company and clothing company same with P. Diddy. What is the big freaking deal?

    [Editor's Note: No one buy's MonaVie gear because it's fashionable... they buy it because it's advertising for the business.]

    Brig is selling tools that are helping people after all the guy is #1 according to Forbes magazine as the biggest earner in Network Marketing and Monavie distributors represent the majority of that list and no not all of them were previously in a network before and that is fact.

    [Editor's Note: Sounds like you just proved that selling tools is the end game. "Not all of them..." so what percentage is it then? (I'm just really curious to know this information, I don't have the answer.)

    Again Alot of people fail because they just give up they don't try hard it enough and that is fact!!!!!!!!!!!

    [Editor's Note: More people fail because the mathematics of multilevel networking requires a bunch of people buying product and failing at the bottom to support the few at top...]

    It seems you are afraid of success and you aren’t very business minded.

    [Editor's Note: Actually from what I can tell from previous postings, Vogel, Candace, and I all have our own businesses and are pretty successful at them.]

    This website is severely misleading people I am just trying to be a voice of reason.

    [Editor's Note: What is misleading about it? Everything I've said in the articles is a fact. If I'm clearly mistaken anywhere, let me know where, and supply your source, and I'll correct the article]

    People if you want to know about Monavie don’t come to a Extremely Biased and Subjective website and make your decision. Meet the people check out a meeting try the product and then decide.

    [Editor's Note: What is the bias here? Candace, Vogel, and I get nothing if people don't sign up for MonaVie. Distributors like you make money if people do sign up for MonaVie. That means the bias is on you. Yes, people like Pearman want you to go to a meeting so that they can tell you about the 40 people or so at the top of pyramid and tempt you with a great fantasy of healthy juice which all science seems to refute. They won't talk about the 85% or more who are barely making minimum wage... and the next 8% of the high owners (so 93% of distributors who are very actively pursuing the business) who are making under $13]

  46. Vogel Says:

    Pearlman 7 said: “Vogel, First off Niles was never convicted of rape and just because one guy out of 3 million distributors makes this a bad company? Haha ……..I guess we should stop watching Kobe Byrant as he is a rapist too right? Or Big Ben?”

    The military court transcript proves you wrong:

    “On February 16, 1992, appellant (Louis B. Niles), a member of the California National Guard on active duty in Title 10 status, was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members at Fort Clayton, Panama. He was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of making a false official statement; conduct unbecoming an officer (3 specifications); and indecent assault, in violation of Articles 107, 133, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 907, 933, and 934, respectively. Two days before commencement of this trial, the Additional Charge and its specification alleging rape in May of 1987 at Fort Hamilton, New York, in violation of Article 120, UCMJ, 10 USC § 920, was referred to trial. Appellant waived the 5-day waiting period prescribed by Article 35, UCMJ, 10 USC § 835. He was also convicted of this offense, contrary to his pleas. He was sentenced to dismissal from the service, confinement for 6 years, and total forfeitures.”
    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/1996Term/95_0738.htm

    Aside from ignoring Niles’ convictions, general court martial,6-year confinement sentence, and expulsion from the National Guard, you are also ignoring the FACT that your company’s executive Black Diamond, Jason Lyons, had Niles pretend to be a doctor specializing in the treatment of cancer patients and go before an audience of prospective recruits to tell them that Monavie can be used to treat cancer. They produced a video of this travesty and posted it on the internet so that distributors could use it to flog Monavie as a cancer cure.

    I could conceivably muster up a crumb of forgiveness for your disgusting company if someone — anyone — had the decency to step up and apologize; condemn this for what it was — fraud, and an extremely poor decision on the part of Jason Lyons and the Monavie organization. That you don’t do this, and instead loudly defend Niles, shows that you too are scum of the worst kind — a menace to society. For that, I will never forgive Monavie and I will work tirelessly, through this blog and with the help of the FDA and FTC, to make sure that your company is buried 6 feet under, as it deserves to be.

  47. Pearman 7 Says:

    Ok so back to my point, One distributor out of 3 million makes this a corrupt company?

    Like I said if you have someone at your office who hit his wife does that make the whole company bad?

    [Editor's Note: Not it many, many more... and a bunch of other things... again see the pile of comments and the other articles here. Actually just read the home page at http://www.juicescam.com/ to get a lot of it. I haven't even added the D- Better Business Bureau rating in it.]

    You have no Bias? You just stated you want to put Monavie 6 ft under and everything on this site in against Monavie completely.

    [Editor's Note: I meant that we aren't financially biased. We make no money if people choose to not buy MonaVie. The reason why want to "put MonaVie 6 ft under" (to use your words) is that it's harming consumers. You have a clear bias as you aim to profit from that harm.]

    Fact is alot of is made up crap and google searches that look cool but are really baseless.

    [Editor's Note: It's called making an objective point and proving it. You haven't made an objective point and proved it yet. Point goes to the "google searches."]

    If you pursue this business and treat it like a business you will succeed with patience and persistence. Again the IDS doesn’t reflect real effort. Some people have bad uplines that don’t provide support some people give up because they get bashed and come to sites like this that nitpick every little thing and get discouraged and some people are just buying the juice to get it at a distributor price.

    [Editor's Note: Those buying juice to get it at the distributors' price are not included in the IDS... it's only if they are signing up people beneath them that they get include. In fact those people who are working hard, but unsuccessful at getting anyone are not counted. How are you measuring "real effort" or "bad uplines"? We have a measure of hours worked, so that seems like "real effort." MonaVie should cancel the distributor licenses of people not giving "real effort" and and close all "bad uplines." Until they do, don't try to put lipstick on this pig of an IDS.]

    Fact is you know absolutely jack squat how Monavie runs it’s company how they make their juice and the people involved. YOU HAVE NO IDEA but you act like you do.

    [Editor's Note: Actually, I think this website proves that we know a lot more than many, many others do. I have had hundreds and hundreds of distributors saying that MonaVie saves people money because 4 ounces replaces 13 servings of fruit - a fact that is completely wrong and MonaVie is the first to admit it. If we have no idea, why don't you enlighten us with something ]

    Let me ask you a question Vogel are you a Atheist?

    What is your background?

    [Editor's Note: As we know Vogel is a giant space octopus from the planet Kelmar. In other words, how is this relevant?]

    How do we know you don’t work for a competing company?

    [Editor's Note: We are fans of just eating fruit. That's what we have always promoted. I suppose you could call that the competing company of Mother Nature.]

  48. Pearman 7 Says:

    Back to the original Topic of this post…………

    “#1:Sambazon is a vertically integrated company meaning that they have total control from start to finish. They buy their acai direct from a co-op of growers (Mona-Vie does not, they go through a middle man which Sambazon used to have to do). The importance with this is the quality of acai varies greatly depending on the season, when it was picked, ect.

    Directly from MonaVie Product Support: “Our acai comes from a supplier. Independent certificates of analysis are issued for the raw ingredients and finished MonaVie product. A certificate of analysis accompanies each raw ingredient. Certificates of analysis validate and verify purity, quality, and safety.” “The açai that MonaVie uses is not from a farm or plantation. It is from wild açai trees within the Amazon Rainforest. We do not buy from any type of farm. We choose to buy from the local Amazonians who literally climb the açai tree to the top and pick the berries.”

    #2: Sambazon is NOT freeze dried after it is bought. the skin and pulp is removed from the seed and it is immediately frozen in large drums to be sent to the US to make it’s juices. The frozen packs of acai they sell at natural food stores is frozen @ the plant in Brazil. this process keeps it extremely fresh for us consumers.

    Direct from MonaVie’s Product Support:
    “Either way is fine. Freeze-drying acai is a different process from freezing. The studies we have are just on our freeze-dried acai. We use both acai puree and freeze-dried acai in our blends. There are many benefits to freeze-drying, such as:

    Freeze dried açai:

    MonaVie uses freeze-dried açai and is the first to use this form of Açai in a juice. This same form of freeze-dried Açai with its proprietary process and associated claims has applied for patent protection in the U.S and 10 international countries. While MonaVie is not the patent owner, the company has been given full access and rights to the patent’s intellectual properties.

    Freeze drying benefits:

    Low temperatures of freeze drying ensure that the powerful phytonutrients remain intact. Other processing methods destroy a significant portion of phytonutrients. Air drying destroys 55 percent phytochemicals and spray drying destroys 70 percent phytochemicals content of açai.

    1. Retains original characteristics of the product, including:
    - color
    - form
    - size
    - taste
    - texture
    - nutrient

    2. Cold storage not required

    3. Reconstitutes to original state when placed in water

    4. No waste

    5. Shelf stable at room temperature

    6. The weight of the freeze-dried products is reduced (70 to 90 percent) with no change in volume

    7. The product is light weight and easy to handle

    8. Saves on shipping; shipping costs are reduced because of weight and lack of refrigeration

    9. Low water activity virtually eliminates microbiological concerns

    10. Offers highest quality in a dry product compared to other drying methods

    MonaVie has tested freeze dried Açai powder nine months after its production date and the nutrient levels were still at the same levels they were at when the freeze dried powder was tested after production.

    Freeze drying process:

    Once picked from the vine, enzymatic degradation deteriorates many valuable nutrients from the berry. The harvested berries are processed within 48 hours to preserve their nutritional content. The Açai fruit is then processed into a pulp containing 14 percent solids. The pulp solids are immediately frozen and placed on trays which enter a freeze drying chamber. This process has many benefits. By freeze drying the Açai fruit, the powerful antioxidants such as polyphenols are preserved.”

    #3: it’s organic. mona vie is not.”

    Direct from MonaVie’s Product Support:

    “The acai used in MonaVie is wild crafted and comes directly from the forest, therefore organic certification would be unnecessary. MonaVie is not certified organic. However, to ensure safety the finished MonaVie products are regularly tested for dozens of pesticides, insecticides, and herbicides by an independent, third-party analytical laboratory. Each test performed has repeatedly found the products to be free of any of these potentially harmful substances. This added step in MonaVie’s quality control process ensures our consumers are getting a safe, pure, and high-quality product.”

    #4: it’s sustainable..aka they only buy from growers that keep a natural ratio of acai palms to other natives on their property. if they start planting all acai, Sambazon won’t buy from them anymore.

    Direct from MonaVie Product Support:

    “What ensures companies such as MonaVie to continue to harvest açai berries in the Amazon Rainforest?

    Total consumption of the Açai fruit including what is consumed in Brazil is approximately 160,000 tons per year representing approximately 20 percent of the açai that is actually available for harvesting. The challenges are not in the amount available but in the effort that is involved in harvesting the berry. Açai grows wild and is harvested by climbing the açai palm tree and picking the fruit much like you would imagine picking coconuts from a palm tree.

    Saving the Rainforest:

    Thank you for your questions about MonaVie and its efforts to preserve the Brazilian Rainforest. MonaVie does all it can to promote and save the rainforest. Here are some astonishing facts about the Rainforest. Fourteen percent of the Earth’s land used to be covered in rainforest, today it is only a mere six percent.

    In 2005 alone 10,088 square miles of the Amazon Rainforest were destroyed. Many of the pharmaceutical drugs used today were originally discovered in the Amazon Rainforest. Because of the abundance of plant life, this area of the world is called appropriately the “lungs of the planet.” We need to do all we can to preserve this section of land and prevent further destruction.

    MonaVie has taken great efforts to help preserve this essential area of the world. The açai that MonaVie uses is not from a farm or plantation. It is from wild açai trees within the Amazon Rainforest. We do not buy from any type of farm. We choose to buy from the local Amazonians who literally climb the açai tree to the top and pick the berries.

    Many of the locals that we buy from have used in the past the açai palm tree specifically for the hearts of palm. The hearts of palm is a section of the trunk popularly used in salads. When the hearts of palm is removed from the açai palm, the açai tree will inevitably die. We have chosen to use many of the same hearts of palm harvesters to now help harvest the açai berry. This helps decrease the production of hearts of palm and destruction of the rainforest.

    We pay the harvesters substantially more to harvest the açai berry than they would otherwise to harvest the hearts of palm. Also, the education we have given to the harvesters of the hearts of palm has shown very beneficial results. Many of these harvesters have begun planting more açai trees when one has died. In this way we have contributed to the preservation of the rainforest and helped the economy in these regions.

    In addition to this, when an açai tree dies naturally (they will live about 100 years), about five seedlings are replanted. The açai berry can be harvested within a few short years. In 2007 alone, we have already helped to preserve over 1,000 acres of the Amazon Rainforest.

    Total consumption of the Açai fruit including what is consumed in Brazil is approximately 160,000 tons per year representing approximately 20 percent of the Açai that is actually available for harvesting. MonaVie is the largest consumer of açai in Brazil. The amount of açai in the rainforest is overwhelming, but we still feel it necessary to continue to preserve this abundant supply.

    Does harvesting the açai berry destroy the Amazon Rainforest?

    No. In fact, MonaVie is helping to preserve the Amazon Rainforest by harvesting the açai berry. Each week, poachers illegally chop down 5,000–10,000 palm trees to obtain and sell a 12-inch section of the palm known as the “palmito.” As a result, the entire tree dies. On the other hand, by harvesting the açai berry, the palm tree continues to thrive and the natives have an incentive to preserve the açai-bearing palm tree.”

    #5: it’s fair-trade. mona vie is not. they pay the growers a higher than average pay for their acai as well as support many side ventures for others in the community.”
    Direct from MonaVie’s product support:

    “MonaVie seeks to conduct its business ethically and responsibly and expects its independent distributors to do the same. MonaVie has implemented the practices and policies for ethical conduct required by the US Direct Selling Association (http://dsa.org/ethics/) and the World Federation of Direct Selling Associations (http://wfdsa.org/world_codes/index.cfm?fa=modelCodeLanguage). These ethical codes and MonaVie’s policies and practices are consistent with fair trade laws and regulations in all jurisdictions in which it operates.”

    In terms of giving back to the local community, click here to read about The MORE Project, a project whose operational costs are funded 100% by MonaVie.

    “#6: as you said, THE PRICE!!! $2.99 for FRESH, ORGANIC acai juice in most major retailer across the country. i live in southern california so i buy it from Albertsons and Vons. Easily accessible.”

    - The price is not comparable when you look at it on a per serving basis. The nutrient claims for both products are based on a per serving basis, so to not compare the price on a per serving basis does not make sense. Click here to review the cost per serving from the original post. MonaVie Original’s retail per serving cost (keep in mind you can purchase it for even cheaper as a distributor for wholesale and even cheaper for bulk pricing) is around $1.56/serving, Sambazon is $2.30/serving.

    - In terms of being easily accessible, MonaVie will show up at your front door step. I don’t think you can get any more accessible than that.

    “#7: there is no water in sambazon. yes, some of the juices are blended with other fruit concentrates…just like mona vie, but once again, these are ORGANIC fruits that are healthy for you.”

    Direct from Distributor Support:

    “MonaVie fruits are purees and concentrates. This is shown on the ingredient label.

    MonaVie Original Juice Ingredients: Proprietary blend of açai (freeze-dried powder and puree); Fruit juice from concentrate (white grape, apple, acerola, aronia, purple grape, cranberry, passion fruit, cupuaçu, prune, kiwi, blueberry, wolfberry [goji], pomegranate, lychee, camu camu); fruit purees (pear, banana, bilberry); natural flavor, citric acid, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate.

    Concentrating is a way to remove the water from a product for ease of shipping.”

    In regards to the organic issue, here is more information direct from MonaVie’s Product Support:

    “The acai used in MonaVie is wild crafted and comes directly from the forest, therefore organic certification would be unnecessary. MonaVie is not certified organic. However, to ensure safety the finished MonaVie products are regularly tested for dozens of pesticides, insecticides, and herbicides by an independent, third-party analytical laboratory. Each test performed has repeatedly found the products to be free of any of these potentially harmful substances. This added step in MonaVie’s quality control process ensures our consumers are getting a safe, pure, and high-quality product.”

    #8: they use agave nectar as a sweetener which is much for your body than cane sugar used elsewhere.”

    Direct from MonaVie Product Support:

    “MonaVie doesn’t use sweeteners in Active, Original, Pulse, and Kosher. The corn syrup solids help emulsify the plant sterols in Pulse.

    Corn syrup solids are very safe. They are used as a carrier in the emulsification process of plant sterols. By emulsifying the plant sterols, they are more easily dispersed into MonaVie Pulse and MonaVie Pulse Gel. This process guarantees you will receive the correct amount of plant sterols in each serving you consume.

    Each serving of MonaVie Pulse contains about 200 mg or 0.2 grams of corn syrup solids, which equates to 0.2 grams of carbohydrates or less than 1 calorie. This is a very small amount. Corn syrup solids should not be confused with high fructose corn syrup, which is often added as one of the first ingredients in sodas and fruit drinks for sweetness and flavor.”

    Also, as far as the sugar goes per serving in your comparison, look at the serving size. For Sambazon it’s the entire 10.5oz bottle, some of which contain 30 grams of sugar per serving and a serving is 8 ounces! So that’s over 30 grams of sugar in one bottle. MonaVie’s serving size is between 1 – 2 oz./serving depending on which drink you are drinking and the range in grams of sugar/serving is between 3 -7 so even a diabetic can, in most cases, safely drink MonaVie.

    MonaVie’s serving size offers a comparable nutritional value in one to two ounces compared to Sambazon’s 8 ounces for a comparable nutritional value (i.e. ORAC units/serving).

    “#9: and last but not least…i could go on for days, acai is EXTREMELY perishable, hence all of sambazon’s products, minus their suppliements need to be refrigerated or frozen and have about a 3mo. shelf life. think twice when you buy that bottle of 1-2yr old mona vie.”

    I have to agree with you here, I too would not want to be drinking a one year old bottle of MonaVie or a 3 month or older bottle of Sambazon. This is the shelf life of the product however, it does not in any way imply that you will be drinking 3 month old Sambazon or 12 month old MonaVie, it is simply stating that after this period of time it is not recommended for consumption. So obviously the sooner you drink it the better.

    To the writer of these comments: I just want the answers, like you, and I am tired of researching all over the internet listening to people pull facts of nowhere that have no references whatsoever. This is why I started this blog in the first place and why I refuse to post anything that came from a source other than MonaVie corporate or wikipedia.

    I am responding to your comments in the form of a post so that we all can benefit from all of the hard work and time and research you and I have dedicated to learning more about these products. I have no problem with Sambazon, I like their products, although I do find their juices to be way too sweet for me. I feel that Sambazon and MonaVie are fairly comparable products for the most part, however Sambazon will never pay me to drink their product and MonaVie will. Sambazon will never give me the wholesale price as a regular consumer, MonaVie will. Sambazon will never allow me to get a bulk order discount as a retail consumer, MonaVie will.

  49. Cyberxion Says:

    You know Pearman, if the “company” is say, a shelter for battered spouses, then yeah, I’d say that it’d probably hurt its integrity to employ someone who beats his wife, especially if they knew ahead of time that he does it. But let’s move past hypothetical situations. Monavie had the man falsify his credentials so that they could pretend to have evidence that their fruit-juice cures cancer. That Monavie would hire a man with his history raises some interesting questions about Monavie’s own integrity, but that’s the smoking gun. Anyone who would sell his integrity like that is a worthless piece of filth. The guy is scum.

    The fact that Monavie sells their product on lies should be enough in itself to raise an eyebrow, and the fact that they hired a scum-bucket and had him falsify his credentials in order to reinforce those lies should be enough to bury the company. It should certainly be enough to send you distributor filth packing, if not drive you to regain whatever integrity you once possessed by admitting that you work for a shady, fraudulent company. It doesn’t leave you a whole lot of wiggle room to argue, and yet you folks continue to insist that everything’s copacetic in Monavie-land even after having this shit shoved in your face. That only serves to damage your credibility even further, as does the fact that you invariably resort to insults when all else fails.

    As far as Vogel’s credibility goes, he provides the sources for all his information. Those sources are all official, and the information he provides is right there for you folks to read if you’d bother, which of course you don’t. Most importantly, you folks lie about the healing benefits of your product all the time, and never, ever provide any sources to back up your claims. It takes a lot of balls for you to say that this is just a lot of “made up crap”, and “baseless Google searches that look cool…”, when you don’t even provide that much.

    Even if it were true, which of course it isn’t, you’ve put yourself in very precarious position by making that accusation at all. If you want your posts to have even a modicum of credibility, then you have to adhere to your own standards from here on out. That means that you have to source your claims just like Vogel does, and that those sources have to be credible, like Vogel’s are. You don’t get to just rattle off a steaming load of marketing speak and leave it at that any longer. You need to put the same work into your posts that Vogel does his, otherwise you’ll have branded yourself a hypocrite, and you folks are already on shaky ground as it is.

    As for whether or not anyone can really succeed selling this, wouldn’t the very real possibility that one could encounter an unsupportive up-line make becoming a distributor the very crap-shoot we’ve said it is? Wouldn’t the fact that there’s no oversight in place to keep a newbie from being undone by a lackadaisical asshole somewhere up the chain mean that he business-model is flawed? I don’t know why I’d bother to put in the hard work and effort if there’s no real assurance that it’s going to mean anything. Why wouldn’t I just get an honest nine-to-five job instead, where at least I’d be assured a paycheck every week for my efforts?

    The rest of the crap you said is just so completely irrelevant as to be laughable. Does Vogel’s background matter? He’s not the one trying to sell something here. Does his religion matter? I don’t understand why you even brought that up. And you know, even if Vogel lived in his Grandmother’s basement, which is unlikely, it wouldn’t alter the fact that he possesses more integrity than the entire lot of you distributor scumbags do, even if we were to count you all as a single entity.

    I can’t wait until Monavie is gone, and all you poor saps wake up to the lies you’ve been fed. I’ll try not to gloat when it happens…too much.

  50. Vogel Says:

    Pearman are F-ing serious with that cut and paste load of BS? Are you going to cut and paste the phone book next? Just make a succinct point and then post a link to back it up. It would take a week to rebut every single misstatement in you regurgitated post.

    It’s quickly becoming obvious that your purpose here is to drown us with noise.

  51. MonaVie Scam Says:

    Pearman 7,

    As Vogel stated it would probably take a week to refute everything, but I’ll give a quick run-down.

    MonaVie went into a lot of details about it’s supplier of acai. That’s awesome, but how can we verify what is said without them disclosing that supplier? Also that says a lot about the supply of 1/19th of the fruits in MonaVie… but it doesn’t say anything about the other 18/19ths of the fruit that make make up MonaVie.

    They made a big point of comparing servings of Sambazon vs. servings of MonaVie. That’s a false comparison as anyone who has read the original article here can tell. I’m just going slap a new serving-size label on my bottle of Sambazon that divides by 8 so that we are comparing two equal serving sizes (one ounce). Then you’ll see that 1-2 ounces (or servings) of Sambazon will have 4-8 grams of sugar and again just about as suitable for diabetics. Even better, you’ll see that the cost per serving goes from $1.56/serving for MonaVie to Sambazon is $0.29/serving. This is why we compare ounces to ounces to make things equal.

    It seems like MonaVie is once again claiming to reconstitute juice with water (as it says that freeze-dried acai is reconstituted), but it is not adding water to its label.

    There were a lot of words above about the process and benefits of freeze-dried acai. However, we (yet again) aren’t given information on how much freeze-dried acai is in MonaVie. In fact, because freeze-dried acai has such a high ORAC score and we know that MonaVie has such a low ORAC score (see Dr. Schauss’ studies), we know that there can’t be a lot of it in MonaVie. In fact we can mathematically prove that it’s less than 2.22% and is likely much lower.

    When MonaVie says, “By freeze drying the Açai fruit, the powerful antioxidants such as polyphenols are preserved”, we have to ask what polyphenols were preserved. We know that there are very few in the final product MonaVie, so why is there focus on the small percentage of acai which is just one of the 19 fruits
    in MonaVie?

    It really doesn’t make any sense like much of the above stuff that Pearman mentioned.

  52. Simple Acai Truth Says:

    Hi All – Wow, a whole lot of confusion out there about acai.

    Keeping it really simple, There’s about as much acai in a $40 bottle of Monavie as a $3 bottle of Sambazon acai juice- but with sambazon it’s USDA organic & fair trade – sambazon juices are kept refrigerated to protect the taste and nutrition- with Monavie there are artificial preservatives and a host of other non organic juice concentrates plus the need to enroll in a network marketing company… friends don’t let friends MLM : ) Sambazon has Pure, unsweetened frozen pulp if you want super potent, unsweetened acai too. All Sambazon products are available at Whole Foods and the juices are also available at most conventional supermarkets these days including some Walmarts, Costcos.

  53. Rasheed Says:

    Too much to read.

    But Cooper, I hope you know you’re going against the Policy and Procedures that you signed when you signed up as a distributor. It clearly states that you are not allowed to say that you get the juice for “free.”

    Also, you are lacking something very important–namely, your distributor ID.

    I just want to know WHY they promote all these expensive tools, sell them at a REALLY marked up price ($5 per CD is pretty expensive when most other MLM’s charge $2.50 or even FREE), when most of the people who listen to all these CDs don’t even succeed?

    Here’s a common conversation.

    “I’m not doing well, I’ve only recruited two people!”
    “Are you listening to your CD’s 10x a day reading all the books and soliciting all your friends?”
    “No…”
    “Then do it! Get on the leadership system which costs upwards of $200 a month and you’ll see results!”

    Yeah… you’ll see results. In your bank account after you find out you’re going broke.

    It’s “work smarter, not harder.” A person can dig a hole for 100 years and still not make it to China. Does that mean he’s not a hard worker? No, because his buddy who was digging the hole with him decided to stop digging and take a plane to China.

    Who succeeded in their goals? The one who quit. He didn’t quit trying to get his goal, he quit that specific “vehicle,” if you will, and found something that worked better.

    A question that ALL network marketers should answer: “Would you buy your product if there were no compensation plan attached?”

    If you saw a $40 bottle of MonaVie on the grocery store shelf, would you buy it, knowing you’d have to buy it every week?

    If so, congrats! If not, you may want to re-evaluate your motives for being with MonaVie.

  54. Gambit Says:

    First of all I found this article helpful and would like to thank you for taking the time to support an intriguing debate none the less taking time to inform others of the research put together. There are just so many viewpoints that honestly whether it’s Sambazon or Monavie as the superior product it solely depends on the consumer. (That’s capitalism for you :P) However, I understand this argument is based on factual evidence incorporating ORAC Score and cost per ounce.
    I’m new to the “acai movement” and wanted to learn more about the superfood as much as possible. After learning about it’s potency as an amazing source of antioxidants and the growing publicity the fruit receives linked to other health benefits backed with scientific research, it is very easy to acknowledge why people especially the health conscious want to get their hands on this berry. Unfortunately too many businesses out there figured it was an easy profitable trade and are destroying the reputation of the acai berry causing more confusion than necessary. I was disappointed of all these “scams” especially when these businesses boast the effectiveness of their product. We’re all aware of them and are on the constant look out for the best product out there so we just use what exactly works for the individual. There is nothing wrong if a person swears by either Monavie or Sambazon but some people need to understand how to debate openly and support their view.
    Anyway back to the point of this post. This research stated that a 10.4 fl oz. serving of Sambazon’s juice or smoothie had anywhere from 5,000 – 15,000 ORAC score. But when I went on Sambazon’s website it never stated an exact measurement of volume that contained these ORAC scores.

    Q: How much Acai should I eat per day to get the benefits?

    A: There is no USDA guideline on how much Acai one should consume in a day. Antioxidant research suggests we should get at least 3000-5000 ORAC units per day to significantly impact antioxidant activity, and reduce as much free radical damage as possible to your body’s cellular structure. On average, most Americans are only taking in about 1200 ORAC units per day, well below recommended levels. One Pack of Sambazon Acai has about 6000 ORAC units, one of our Acai smoothies or juices have anywhere 5,000- 15,000 ORAC units.

    http://www.sambazon.com/footer/faq

    Sambazon sells two completely different volumes of 10.5 fl oz. and 32. fl oz juices/smoothies.

    How do we know if the 10.5 fl oz bottle contains the minimum ORAC score of 5,000 and the 32 fl oz. bottle contains 15,000?

    If I have made a mistake please inform me of it. Hopefully you can prove 10.4 fl oz. or 10.5 fl oz. version of the bottle contains the maximum ORAC score of 15,000 of course. Regardless, the 32 fl oz bottle cost about $8.00 so it’s still more cost effective than Monavie’s $40.00 bottle.

    By the way I tried my first bottle of Sambazon 100% acai juice and was definitely satisfied. The taste was great surprisingly but it’s only my first day so I’ll keep using it for a while to further evaluate my overall experience with this product. I intend to get the Monavie version as well later on since I’ve never tried it.
    Thank you

  55. MonaVie Scam Says:

    I think you answered your own question when you said, “Regardless, the 32 fl oz bottle cost about $8.00 so it’s still more cost effective than Monavie’s $40.00 bottle.”

  56. Vogel Says:

    Gambit said: “I’m new to the “acai movement” and wanted to learn more about the superfood as much as possible. After learning about it’s potency as an amazing source of antioxidants and the growing publicity the fruit receives linked to other health benefits backed with scientific research, it is very easy to acknowledge why people especially the health conscious want to get their hands on this berry. Unfortunately too many businesses out there figured it was an easy profitable trade and are destroying the reputation of the acai berry causing more confusion than necessary.”

    You sure are taking a lot for granted. What exactly is the “acai movement”? Is that a new political party? Acai’s “reputation” is built on marketing fluff (and quite a few lawsuits, but we’ll ignore those for now). The “movement” seems to consist mostly of victims of false advertising and financially-motivated rubes and conmen who profess that processed acai cures medical conditions. What exactly do you think it is that makes acai, or for that matter Monavie, a “superfood”? Because some talking head on the Oprah show might have said so? Where’s the evidence to support the claim that acai (or acai juice) is “an amazing source of antioxidants”. And where on earth is there even a stitch of evidence that acai/acai juice has “other health benefits backed with scientific research”. Why are you parroting empty sound bites and why do you sound so much like an acai brochure/salesman?

    Where is the evidence that “the health-conscious want to get their hands on this berry” (or that they should or ever would get close to an actual acai berry)? From what I can see, the people who have tried to “get their hands on this berry” consist mostly of (a) the thousands of people who were ripped off by online acai diet pill scams (prompting the FTC to intervene); and (b) the thousands of distributors (aka victims) of Monavie who were required to buy acai juice as an admission fee for participation in a pyramid scam.

    The people who aren’t out there running acai schemes and scams consist of simple consumers who might occasionally buy some inexpensive pure acai juice or acai juice blend form the supermarket (V-8 Acai, Bom-Dia) or health food store (Sambazon, Kundsen’s). They probably buy these juices because they taste OK and are reasonably priced, and maybe to some extent because of the influence of wildly exaggerated marketing myths about acai’s antioxidants, “superfruit” status, and “other health benefits”.

  57. Food Tech in CA Says:

    Gambit, the term “superfruit” or “superjuice” is meaningless in the scientific community. Superfoods is a marketing term. There is no fruit or juice so potent that it would be in a class by itself. Always remember to take into account the serving size when comparing fruits and juices. For instance, you mentioned that Sambazon will give you 5,000 ORAC units for 10.5 ounces. One average size apple (150 gms.) will give you 6,413 units. So, no matter what superjuice or superfood you come up with, I can beat it by simply eating another apple. Save your money. Eat fresh fruits and vegetables. When mamma rat had its litter, one pup ran off and formed MonaVie. Another started Sambazan. These sleazy juice companies are preying upon the consumer’s scientific ignorance.

  58. Vogel Says:

    Sambazon has probably stretched the truth a bit too and they have definitely benefited from all the acai hype (they might have even been involved in creating it). But in fairness they’ve never used illegally medical claims as the conerstone of their marketing, their product’s aren’t stupidly expensive like Monavie’s, and they aren’t an MLM. I don’t really have a beef with Sambazon; they aren’t pushing the limits any more than any other legit company. Agree or disagree?

  59. Mackwiz Says:

    I agree. I don’t think Sambazon and MonaVie are comparable when we are talking about outrageous prices and illegal medical claims. It seems like they are engaging in more traditional legal business behavior while MonaVie is miles away. I haven’t had one person claim Sambazon cured their back pain. It doesn’t make Sambazon’s superfood claims any different, but if you are going to buy into acai hype, at least be a little smarter than signing your life and wallet away.

  60. Food Tech in CA Says:

    MonaVie is in a sleaze league by itself. The nonsense their distributors come up with is astounding. You can look at these companies from two perspectives. One from a legal and ethical point of view, where, hands down, MonaVie rules the underbelly. The second is from a pure numbers comparison for nutritional value. In this case, all of the so-called “superjuices” fall flat on their faces when compared to fresh fruits and vegetables. MonaVie is no deal when compared to Sambazon, and Sambazon or MonaVie is no deal when compared to a simple apple.

  61. Skanda Says:

    Hi All – Ed Nichols “Skanda” here… Not sure how I ended up receiving emails from this blog but when I read the posts, I was saddened to see that our company was being spoken of with such negativity.

    I’m very happy to help answer any questions anyone may have. My email address is ed@sambazon.com and my cell phone is 949 244 5651.

    Warmly,

    skanda (my yoga name if anyone is curious)

    Co-Founder Sambazon

  62. MonaVie Scam Says:

    Ed,

    On May 24, 2010, someone commented as “Simple Acai Truth” with your email address. I presume it was you or someone else who you disclosed your email address to. When a comment is posted you can click the area that says, “Subscribe to Comments on this” (or something similar). These emails come with direction to unsubscribe if you choose to.

    I’m just trying to clear that up and make sure you know that it wasn’t done by me as the owner of this website.

    Your participation here is greatly welcomed. It is probably best to answer the questions in a public forum rather than privately through email or phone as others might be interested in the answers.

  63. Vogel Says:

    Well, well, well…Ed Nichols in the virtual flesh. Awesome dude! Thanks for dropping by. I think you can add a LOT to this conversation. BTW, don’t be too saddened; Sambazon was pretty much given a free pass here by most of the regular contributors (including me).

    I think your company has done a lot of things very well and it has not resorted to the deceptive practices of Monavie; I’ve pointed this out on several occasions because you deserved credit for it.

    Here’s what I like about Sambazon’s marketing. You use USDA certified organic acai; you specify the amount of berries per bottle/serving; you give a rough idea of the ORAC (not that ORAC necessarily matters all that much); you list omega FAs on the label; you don’t use sodium benzoate; you have done a good job of promoting fair-trade practices; you have set up your own acai farms; you don’t promote your juices as miracle cures; you price the products fairly; you aren’t an MLM; you were first to market; and you have a corporate image that fits in well with the holistic surfer vibe down here in SoCal.

    I have often felt bad about the fact that you did so much to build a reputable business and pretty much put acai on the map as a commodity, and then got inadvertently tarred by the same brush as Monavie and the acai-powder supplement scams that the FTC was forced to litigate against. That must suck! It’s a bit ironic, in a sad way, that acai turned out to be double-edged sword and made victims of its earlier successes.

    I’m not going to expect you to go too far out on a limb about how the nutritional value of acai compares to other fruits, but one thing you could comment on is the acai research by Monavie/Alexander Schauss/AIBMR, which is the source of Monavie’s claims about acai being a superfruit. Are you aware that the ORAC value for their freeze-dried acai relative to other whole fruits was misrepresented because it didn’t take hydration into account – in other words, if standardized for water content, the ORAC of freeze-dried acai (1027) is NOT remarkably higher than that of other fruits.

    So what’s on your mind Ed? Let’s talk. I’m curious to hear anything you have to say about acai, Monavie, competitors…really, whatever is on your mind…I’m all ears. You can even take the fifth if/when you feel it’s necessary. I really give you huge props for showing up here. Dallin Larceny never had the guts to make an appearance, or even send a delegate (other than some trifling little peon named Shante, an executive’s daughter, who added bupkis to the dialog).

  64. Vogel Says:

    Thanks for pointing out that May 24 post from Ed, Lazyman. No one ever responded to his post, but I remember thinking at the time that there was nothing said that I would disagree with; all the points made were legitimate. Looking forward to some interesting discussion from Ed going forward; and as you pointed out, it would be best to conduct it here on this forum rather than offline.

  65. Food Tech in CA Says:

    Ed, I can see how you would take offence to being mentioned in the same paragraph with MonaVie (who wouldn’t?). Vogel already mentioned the ethical differences in the two companies, and you should get credit where credit is due. However, having said that, your company, like many other promoters of “superjuices” is still guilty of misleading the public on the nutritional advantages of acai (or other “superfruits”) over common produce. My first question would be: why is the ORAC value of the 10.5 oz. bottle of Sambazon listed as 5,000 to 15,000? That’s quite a range. This tells me two possibilities. Either the acai product you are using is from different suppliers (likely) and the quality differs greatly. Or, the operation that manufactures the product for you doesn’t have the technical expertise to correctly standardize a batch.

    My next question is pretty simple: why buy any “superjuice”, when a serving has a lower ORAC score than a simple apple? The 10.5 oz. bottle is a pretty large serving size for a fruit juice. Most, average 6-8 oz. That must be taken into account when comparing nutritional values.

    And finally, where can I find the scientific documentation of not only the ORAC value of your product, but the anthocyanin levels? Anthocyanins are a good indicator of acai levels in a product, so I would expect the test results will verify that.

    I appreciate you responding here. No one from MonaVie would ever have done the same.

  66. Mackwiz Says:

    Ed,

    I honestly think that if anything, we have spoken positively of your company and have given it an honest review (Vogel’s comments say it all). I know it sucks to have to be compared to MonaVie but in all honesty when I view this page I think “buy Sambazon instead”.

  67. Rasheed Says:

    MackWiz, I think Ed may be referring to the MonaVie distributor’s blogpost. I didn’t see anything negative about Sambazon in this JS article either.

    Of course, the distributor is highly misinformed about Sambazon.

  68. Vogel Says:

    …but if he doesn’t come back and talk to us, that might change!

  69. Anonymous Aussie Says:

    Exactly!

    I have to say that I’m with Food Tech on this one….none of these juices are remotely an adequate substitute for fresh fruit and they certainly aren’t what I’d personally consider for my family.

  70. Rasheed Says:

    In terms of being “superjuice,” iI probably wouldn’t recommend it. In terms of being juice, as long as it is competitively priced to other fruit juices (and tastes good too!), I wouldn’t mind drinking it. After all, juice is juice. I drink it when I’m thirsty. And I wouldn’t mind a couple of ORAC points for drinking ssomething id drink anyway. It doesn’t replace anything in my diet, but it never hurts to have a bit extra for the days I forget to buy apples at the store (and am too lazy to do so!)

    I know Ed’s getting these emails. He stated that already, unless he unsubscribed himself. I don’t see anything wrong with this article; if anything, it says “drink Sambazon instead of MonaVie!”then at least you can go, “hey you know that juice MonaVie? I have a juice that’s better than it and cheaper!”

    Lazyman is pretty much advertising for you, Ed!

  71. Vogel Says:

    I think we’re all pretty much on the same page. All a juice has to do to fulfill expectations is be liquidy, capable of quenching thirst, taste OK, show the ingredients on the label, and not be overly expensive. Manufacturers go out on a limb when they promise much more than that. The whole superfruit concept is marketing BS, but a lot of mainstream bev makers exploit it to some extent. Sambazon doesn’t seem to be much/any more guilty of this than other retail companies, although I would prefer that they all drop the BS and just market the product based on taste, price, ingredients, and quality. Drop the antioxidant angle altogether — it’s a fading fad; science is providing more and more evidence that supplementing with antioxidants willy-nilly may be useless at best and harmful at worst.

    we all seem to agree that fresh whole fruits and veggies are the ideal, but still, a glass of good juice a day (grapefruit, OJ, grape, and pomegranate are my favorites) is OK and counts as ONE daily F/V serving.

  72. Vogel Says:

    BTW, Ed, I should add that I purposely avoid buying ANY acai-based product based on all the senseless hype and BS. Fix that, and you might make a customer out of me someday. Blame Monavie and the supplement scammers.

  73. Anonymous Aussie Says:

    HA! I’m so with you on that Vogel – Monavie has really put a foul taste in my mouth concerning all these acai products (and fruit juices in general actually).

    I do accept people like to drink fruit juice and if you’re going to drink it, it’s not unreasonable want one that’s as healthy as a fast food can possibly be.

    I get frustrated to no end to see fruit juices being misleadingly promoted as a “superjuice” or on par with fresh food because we all know they’re simply not.

    p.s When I eat out and want a juice, I always ask for freshly squeezed – delicious!

  74. Food Tech in CA Says:

    I agree, if the customer is getting a product at a reasonable price, then I won’t have any issues. Freedom of choice on that. But like Vogel said, drop the marketing BS. Describing ORAC and superjuices, tend to make the consumer think that they can get away from eating fresh fruits and vegetables because these “superjuices” are better for you. They aren’t. But if you want to supplement your diet, it certainly is better than sodas. And yes, the mainstream food and beverage companies are just as guilty as the specialty products. We need tougher food labeling laws, not weaker.

  75. Rasheed Says:

    I just find it really ironic that all of these “healthy” drinks are really making America less healthy…

    With the way the media portrays how healthy fruit juices are, more and more people are beginning to believe that they can have their “fast fruit” with just a glass of OJ or something…

  76. Skanda Says:

    Hey Guys,

    Very sorry for the delay in getting back to you! I’ve been out at the American Dietetic Show in Boston and am now at the Yoga Journal conference in Florida…

    Just after receiving your replies to my latest email, I wrote for an hour hoping to answer all the concerns expressed on this blog only to loose it all just as I was wrapping it all up (classic).

    Firstly, I’d like to confirm that I was the sender of the email from back in April/May… I’d forgotten writing it.

    Now on to attempting to address some of the questions brought up in the posts… BTW I was only bummed when I happen to read the rat comment but know better than take it personally… We certainly aren’t perfect anyways!

    With respect to using the word superfood or superfruit… yes, this is obviously an unscientific word/phrase. I do think it is fitting with respect to acai in that when I first visited the Amazon to research acai (back in 2000), I was told that of the 200+ edible species of fruits in the local amazon ecosystem (the floodplains), acai was considered to be the most powerful (I know, powerful is also an unscientific word and I feel the pain of those of you who are academics – I was educated as a Biologist). In addition, when you eat acai, you’re only eating the skin and what little pulp lies beneath it; and so, the anthocyanin portion of the resulting pulp is concentrated by virtue of the fruits anatomy… you may also be familiar with the richness of fatty acids coming from the fruit, the ratio of which very closely resembles that of olive oil… I do think it is novel that acai delivers both a richness of anthocyanins and healthy fats; that is to say, acai can be justified as being called a superfruit for delivering these two nutritional benefits from one fruit… also noteworthy – acai has the essential amino acid ratio of an egg and is a dense source of micronutrients.

    Now, with respect to the paradigm of, why wouldn’t I just eat fruit from the produce section and save my money… a very valid point!.. Being vegetarian and having the utmost respect for the principles of macrobiotics, one certainly can’t go wrong making such a choice…

    When you look closely at our juices, you’ll see that the cost/oz does not compare well to eating raw fruits and veggies. This being said, the juices do deliver a high degree of potency and authenticity when compared to packaged juices in the premium juice category. The range of antioxidants stated for our juices is due to the different blends we use… some blends yield higher ORACs than others. We process all our own acai at our plant that is situated right on the equator away from the city of Belem… truly in the center of the acai harvest… use google earth if you’re interested to see Amapa, BR. I’m confident that if you all hung out for us for a week at our corporate offices in San Clemente or at our factory in Brazil you’d be super stoked!

    So, the juices are a finished packaged good that were designed to be potent, delicious and convenient. What I eat is 2 packs of our Pure pulp or Pure Fuzion in my blended acai bowl each morning. I’d love to be able to blend you all bowls each morning for a couple weeks, take you through a yoga and or surf session so you can see why we love acai so much. There’s an ephemeral and unquantifiable quality/power to the fruit that goes beyond deduction. This is what we try to convey through our brand.. this sense of inspiration and positivity rather than trying to make unnecessary claims…

    And lastly (for now), we started Sambazon when we realized that the native people in the amazon make more money selling the fruit that wood… it was this fact that gave us the real light bulb moment. We realized that if we could create a market for acai in N. America, we could have a dynamic of market driven conservation. We named our company sambazon as an imperfect acronym for saving and managing the brazilian amazon so we’d be constantly reminded of our intentions… since the company began what was about a decade ago, our extractive reserve has grown to 2 million acres and there are around 10k people harvesting under fair trade.

    I’m sorry for my typos and run-on sentences and for not answering all of your questions but I have to run for my evening meditation and dinner before serving more bowls to the yoga crowd over the next few days. I’ll see if I can post an antho score for our pulp as well… BTW – We avoid using ORAC in our marketing because it’s so easy to fudge and we know people are doing it by virtue of everything from sodium benzoate to grape seed extract… we just try to serve up the freshest, most potent products possible.

    Your in all things Acai,

    -ed

  77. Skanda Says:

    Hey Guys – I’m sorry it’s taken me so long to reply! I’ve written 2 x 1hour replies only to accidentally loose the first one strangely and then the second just now when the server apparently ‘encountered and error’ (classic)…

    Well, I have to run now but will try to answer everyone’s question again another time (saving in a word doc first this time).

    Are you sure one of you doesn’t want to call me and then transcribe our conversation. I’m not trying to hide anything, I”m just pressed for time in-between trade show travel. My cell is 949 244 5651.

    Warmly,

    -ed

  78. Skanda Says:

    Nice, I can see now that my second long one did post – hurray!

    -ed

  79. Vogel Says:

    Yah Ed, I like the whole crunchy granola/Amazonian surfer-lifestyle angle of Sambazon’s marketing. But like I said, all acai companies get tarred by the brush that Monavie wielded so ineptly. It would behoove us all to unite and change the situation. Let’s get past the marketing veneer and talk about some of real meatier issues. Surprise me; tell me something I don’t know. And don’t pull any punches for Monavie. Silence on that issue disturbs me.

  80. Food Tech in CA Says:

    Ed, I’m a bottom line numbers person, so I’ll get right to it. There was a study by the Center for Human Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA. It was published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56, 1415-1422. Comparison of Antioxidant Potency of Commonly Consumed Polyphenol-Rich Beverages in the United States.

    One of the products tested under the acai juice category, was Sambazon Mango Uprising (lot ASA07029 APR 2007, lot 0610T HA16PTK13, 4/7/2007, lot ASA07073 12 JUN 2007).

    The study found that this product had an ORAC average of 17.1 umoles/ml. That’s even less than ORAC-anemic MonaVie (22.81 umoles/ml.), and well behind Black Cherry Juice (25.3 umoles/ml.), Blueberry Juice (20.6 umoles/ml.), Concord Grape Juice (25.9 umoles/ml.), and Pomegranate Juice (25 umoles/ml.). I can see why you don’t advertise your ORAC. The average phenolic content of acai juices (all brands) was 2.1 mg/ml. Blueberry juice was 2.3 mg/ml., Concord Grape Juice was 2.6 mg/ml., and Pomegranate Juice was 3.8 mg/ml.

    One red delicious apple (150 gm. avg) will give you an ORAC value of 6,413 umoles. An 8 oz. glass of Sambazon Mango Uprising will give you an ORAC value of 3,034 umoles.

    So, again, fruit juices do not compare to fruits. Please stop insisting that these are some type of super juices. They are not. If anyone wants to drink your product, I have no objections, because the price is far more reasonable than MonaVie. But super, it is not.

  81. Skanda Says:

    Responding to “Food Tech in CA” posted Dec 7th @ 7:58pm…

    Yup, as you may or may not have noticed, the UCLA study was a bit of a mess… It compares mixed juices with fresh fruit and in some cases dry powder. We also believe there could be significant methodological flaws as well… BTW, The Co-Investigator of the study has a POM connection… Needless to say, the study was, well less than scientific if you catch my drift.

    If you were going to compare pure fruits, why would you have selected our Acai/Mango blend rather than our Pure Pulp? This is a rhetorical question BTW : )

    That’s right… fruit juices compare to fruit juices and fruits to fruits. Weather something is super is subjective (not scientific). Both sides of my brain rest assured that our products are indeed super (fresh, potent, organic, fair trade, yummy, driving ecological sustainability etc.)

    I really think you’d like our Pure Pulp Smoothie packs! They yield over 10,000 ORAC/3.5oz (100g) individual smoothie pack.

    Thank you for your candid opinions – I mean it!

    I’m happy to share that we have a clinical trial (controlled human pilot study) about to publish showing real world benefit in our acai lowering blood sugar and insulin.

    TBC & Happy Holidays All,

    -skanda

  82. Food Tech in CA Says:

    Skanda, please read the study. The comparisons are for juices, iced tea, and red wine. No fresh fruit was compared, nor were any dry powders analyzed. The study seems to be valid, in my opinion. If you have some issues with the methodology, please be specific.

    As for your pure pulp smoothie pack, please cite the analysis which validated your claim. Also, if you wish to post ORAC scores from any of your any beverages, please do so. Again, no offense, but I need verifiable data, not marketing propaganda.

    Forgive me for not believing any of the nonsense the fad juice people throw around. Show me the facts.

  83. Jeremy Says:

    Hey F–kers! Leave Sambazon alone… They are the s–t! And they do business the way it should be done. At least they don’t scam a 100K people into buying a shit load of their product with the idea that they are gonna be rich.

    Plus, can you eat granola with monavie? I don’t think so!!

  84. Mackwiz Says:

    Great argument Jeremy, I didn’t realize Sambazon is the s–t. If I had known, I would have prostrated myself to them as well.

    Compared to MonaVie, Sambazon is saintly, but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t stand up to scientific analysis. What we are trying to do is cut through the BS and as Food Tech said, get real data instead of marketing propaganda.

    That being said, I do drink Sambazon from time to time, and I have no real ill will towards it, so I am not sure where your belligerent attitude comes from, as no one has really said anything about the product other than to put it on the testing table.

  85. Mackwiz Says:

    Here is a MLM site commenting on ASEA:

    http://mlmblog.net/site/2010/02/asea-scam.html

    If you read the comments, you will find it almost identical to the way MonaVie is both criticized and promoted… hmmm…

    Could this not be the “salt water of a thousand truths”? I was so pumped for it’s redox molecules to wash down my gullet and cure all my ailments in one swift stroke.

    Here’s a good e-mail signature:
    “NOT ALL MLMs ARE PYRAMID SCAMS. I agree… most are! But this is REAL!” -Whiplash, ASEA believer in the one true MLM

  86. Mr. Jackson Says:

    I have been drinking Monavie for over a year now. I am financially sound so the money making part was of no interest. I suffer from Crohn’s disease which I have had for over 15 years. With this I can become very tired, I have lots of stomach pain and arthritic type symptoms. I am one of those people that will try it for myself and if works it works if not I will move on. After a week of drinking the Monavie Active and (m)Mun I felt better then I have in years and then tried their weight loss stuff and lost over 25lbs. After a month I started to cut back on some of my meds and have had less issues and pain then ever. Mornings use to be the worst time of the day now its my favorite. Yes the stuff is very expensive and I spend upwards of $300 a month by the time I buy for myself and family.

    Now to my question: Has anyone in this blog tried both Monavie and Sambazon? If so, can you tell me if you had the same response from Sambazon as you did with Monavie? If so please respond. I’m no idiot, if I can spend less and get the same results I am happy to switch to Sambazon or any other product that will effect me as much as Monavie has. I don’t give a crap about numbers, this and thats and who say’s what. I just want results and if I can do it at lower cost then great, maybe I will spend the extra money on more product to give away and spread the word because yes “acai” is a SUPERFRUIT!!! in more ways then I would have ever believed.

    Respectfully,

    J.

  87. MonaVie Scam Says:

    A lot of people claim to be financially sound when they really aren’t. Many people thought they were financially sound until a stock market crash and housing bubble crash in the last few years. Maybe you’ve got millions of dollars in a money bin. In that case, I say go for it. Nearly $5000 a year for fruit juice is up there. At least you can buy it on Ebay and save a ton of money.

    Mr. Jackson, as you probably know MonaVie is not medicine and it can’t help you with pain or arthritic symptoms. There have been many studies (you can see a few cited at here) that show glucosamine to being no better than placebo with arthritic symptoms.

    Furthermore, it has been shown that MonaVie provides little nutrition.

    When you use the “I’ll just try it” line of thinking, you are opening yourself up to the placebo effect.

    There is little evidence that acai is a superfruit. The term superfruit isn’t scientific. I could say an apple is a superfruit and we’d have to agree that it is just as super as acai since there is no definition.
    If you really want acai, you shouldn’t get it in juice form. When a fruit is juiced much of the fiber is stripped away in the processing. Costco has some dark chocolate-acai bites that would give you more superfruit at a likely better price if you indeed decide to go that way.

 
Comment Rules: Before commenting for the first time, please read this website's About page as well as the MonaVie Scam home page. Chances are, your comment has already been addressed elsewhere. Also, if your comment is not on the topic of the article, I may choose to not publish it. Please find an appropriate article in the MonaVie archives. If you can not find one, please to contact me and I'll work with you to get an article written.

At times comments might be disabled or moderated to a time more suiting with my schedule.

* Copy this password:

* Type or paste password here:

Previous: MonaVie and Houston Rockets
Next: MonaVie Tries to Suppress the Truth
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 214 access attempts in the last 7 days.