Comments on: MonaVie is Embarrassed by Their Income Disclosure Statement?

By: Vogel

Vogel — Sun, 25 Jul 2010 01:32:35 +0000

Good question but my guess is that it the new IDS will be out soon. The 2009 mid-year IDS ran from July 2008 to June 2009.

One thing that you can be sure of. The data will be rigged to the extent that they think they can get away with it.

By: Eric

Eric — Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:04:04 +0000

Here is what is very telling on the IDS. They used to publish an end of year IDS, but for some reason they did not for end of year 2009. Why would they decide to do that? All the money flows to the top and you can buy it on eBay for less than the typical distributor pays and they do not care. It is heavily flavored and preserved with Sodium Benzoate which is banned in many countries.

By: Food Tech in CA

Food Tech in CA — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:47:58 +0000

Larry writes: “Of course you don’t think he’s challenged you Foodtech because your are lost and vastly overatted in your opinions which you try to pass of as fact and the end all answer”

**Larry, you or anyone else are always welcome to challenge anything that I post. So, far, no one has been able to disprove, even a single claim I’ve made.

The reason is simple. My comments are based on peer-reviewed scientific studies and analysis. All that I do is a little simple research, and cite my references. I’m still waiting to be proven incorrect on any point.

By: MonaVie Scam

MonaVie Scam — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:16:55 +0000

Just because it doesn’t *have* to be shown anywhere else doesn’t mean that it can’t be. The IDS wasn’t on Wikipedia… it was just a link to the IDS. If the IDS is a marketing tool that MonaVie is proud of, it doesn’t make sense that MonaVie would be deleting the link on Wikipedia to it. If they proud of it, they’d bold it, underline it, or otherwise try to call attention to it.

By: Anonymous Aussie

Anonymous Aussie — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:32:08 +0000

How ironic Tom should be criticising anyone for their lack of understanding Monavie’s own IDS taking into consideration his ability to interpret same is restricted to merely reading the first column (Active Distributor Rank) and the 7th column (Annualized Average Check).

Good one, dippy!

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:37:19 +0000

IDS is freely available through http://www.monavie.com web site – it does not have to be shown anywhere else – IDS is a marketing tool – and MV is proud of it – show me any other company that you have so many distributors making more than 200K a year working part-time –

You are not going to understand IDS as you describe yourself as a “scientist”.

By: MonaVie Scam

MonaVie Scam — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:18:22 +0000

Larry, obviously is misunderstanding the difference between fact and opinion. I do a little of both on this site.

Take the article above for instance. MonaVie clearly edited their Wikipedia article against Wikipedia’s terms of use to remove their Income Disclosure Statement (IDS). That’s a fact that no one has disputed. I proposed a reasonable conclusion (my opinion) that MonaVie must be embarrassed by the IDS. If you have a different opinion as to why they’d want to hide information from the public, I’d love to hear it. No one has come up with a reasonable alternative conclusion.

By: Larry

Larry — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:46:21 +0000

Of course you don’t think he’s challenged you Foodtech because your are lost and vastly overatted in your opinions which you try to pass of as fact and the end all answer

By: Food Tech in CA

Food Tech in CA — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:58:17 +0000

That’s true. So far, with Tom, I haven’t had to do anything but write comments off the top off my head. He writes a lot, but says nothing.

By: Anonymous Aussie

Anonymous Aussie — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:24:00 +0000

I’m not sure Food Tech – Tom’s done a great deal of cutting and pasting which by far exceeds your efforts.