<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MonaVie EMV Lite: Now With Less Energy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/</link>
	<description>Is MonaVie a Scam?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:51:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food Tech in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5055</link>
		<dc:creator>Food Tech in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 01:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5055</guid>
		<description>Actually, Vogel really held back.  I think he was just toying with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Vogel really held back.  I think he was just toying with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vogel</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5048</link>
		<dc:creator>Vogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5048</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. When a distributor violates their contract by posting anonymously, it demonstrates dishonesty, a lack of pride in the business, and unwillingness to stand behind their advertising claims. I think that some of the distributors here are extra reluctant to abide by this policy because it would hinder their ability to post under different user names and to use multiple dissenting posts to create the illusion of strength in numbers.

What really galls though is their lack of humility. I mean, let&#039;s face it, we&#039;ve dealt with some really frighteningly uneducated Monavie distributors who could barely write coherent sentences and really knew nothing about the product, but it never stopped them from being strident  and accusatory, particularly when the facts didn&#039;t fall their way. Even those who started out halfway lucid and civilized eventually degenerated after being proven wrong a few times.

If these were honest people who wanted to engage in honest debate, they simply wouldn&#039;t behave as they do, nor would they be so quick to resort to misinformation, redirection, strawman arguments, and ad hominem attacks.

An honest person who didn&#039;t know much about the product would come here asking questions, not simply posting blurbs from Monavie brochures and then getting angry when we use facts, with which we are well acquainted, and simple logic to show why the claims are either false or do not support the value of the product or business. And once shown the facts, they should absorb them and acknowledge them as such, rather than looking away and changing the subject. When proven wrong, a humble person admits it. But not these buffoonish Monavie distributors; they all seem to have the same dangerous mix of ignorance, arrogance, and greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. When a distributor violates their contract by posting anonymously, it demonstrates dishonesty, a lack of pride in the business, and unwillingness to stand behind their advertising claims. I think that some of the distributors here are extra reluctant to abide by this policy because it would hinder their ability to post under different user names and to use multiple dissenting posts to create the illusion of strength in numbers.</p>
<p>What really galls though is their lack of humility. I mean, let&#8217;s face it, we&#8217;ve dealt with some really frighteningly uneducated Monavie distributors who could barely write coherent sentences and really knew nothing about the product, but it never stopped them from being strident  and accusatory, particularly when the facts didn&#8217;t fall their way. Even those who started out halfway lucid and civilized eventually degenerated after being proven wrong a few times.</p>
<p>If these were honest people who wanted to engage in honest debate, they simply wouldn&#8217;t behave as they do, nor would they be so quick to resort to misinformation, redirection, strawman arguments, and ad hominem attacks.</p>
<p>An honest person who didn&#8217;t know much about the product would come here asking questions, not simply posting blurbs from Monavie brochures and then getting angry when we use facts, with which we are well acquainted, and simple logic to show why the claims are either false or do not support the value of the product or business. And once shown the facts, they should absorb them and acknowledge them as such, rather than looking away and changing the subject. When proven wrong, a humble person admits it. But not these buffoonish Monavie distributors; they all seem to have the same dangerous mix of ignorance, arrogance, and greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silo</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5043</link>
		<dc:creator>silo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5043</guid>
		<description>IheartEMV (and others)

If you had followed the timeline of this site, you  would understand Vogel&#039;s shortness in his replies.

Dozens, if not hundreds of times, Monavie supporters show up on the site and begin the pitch.  They accuse the regular posters here of working for a competitor, or of being too lazy to give the product a try, or of having no life, or of not knowing the facts about Monavie.  You yourself are guilty of a few of these in your early posts.  Yet on every occasion, the &#039;facts&#039; presented by distributors are unsupported and debunked, and the FACTS posted by the regulars here are cited, supported and uncontested.  

This site isn&#039;t about opinion, or testimonials, or faith in a product/company.  This site posts facts and cites references to support them.  Those facts remain uncontested by Monavie corporate, its scientific advisory board and especially by its distributors.  Those same facts get in the way of recruiting potential downline distributors, especially those who have the ethical wherewithall to avoid scamming people.  When those recruits research the company, they will have additional resources through this site to counter the illegal distributor claims about the product.  

The bottom line is that the product is overpriced and lacking in nutrition.  The cost is in no way justified.  The tactics used by distributors to sell the product are unethical at best and outright dangerous at worst.

As a distributor, if you don&#039;t know the true facts and you sell this product, you are merely irresponsible and doing a disservice to your customers (financially and nutritionally).  If you do know the facts, and choose to make the sale anyway, you deserve all the ire that Vogel has directed at you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IheartEMV (and others)</p>
<p>If you had followed the timeline of this site, you  would understand Vogel&#8217;s shortness in his replies.</p>
<p>Dozens, if not hundreds of times, Monavie supporters show up on the site and begin the pitch.  They accuse the regular posters here of working for a competitor, or of being too lazy to give the product a try, or of having no life, or of not knowing the facts about Monavie.  You yourself are guilty of a few of these in your early posts.  Yet on every occasion, the &#8216;facts&#8217; presented by distributors are unsupported and debunked, and the FACTS posted by the regulars here are cited, supported and uncontested.  </p>
<p>This site isn&#8217;t about opinion, or testimonials, or faith in a product/company.  This site posts facts and cites references to support them.  Those facts remain uncontested by Monavie corporate, its scientific advisory board and especially by its distributors.  Those same facts get in the way of recruiting potential downline distributors, especially those who have the ethical wherewithall to avoid scamming people.  When those recruits research the company, they will have additional resources through this site to counter the illegal distributor claims about the product.  </p>
<p>The bottom line is that the product is overpriced and lacking in nutrition.  The cost is in no way justified.  The tactics used by distributors to sell the product are unethical at best and outright dangerous at worst.</p>
<p>As a distributor, if you don&#8217;t know the true facts and you sell this product, you are merely irresponsible and doing a disservice to your customers (financially and nutritionally).  If you do know the facts, and choose to make the sale anyway, you deserve all the ire that Vogel has directed at you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonaVie Scam</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5039</link>
		<dc:creator>MonaVie Scam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 23:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5039</guid>
		<description>I find it really odd that distributors can scam people out of thousands a year, but can never seem stand few insults.  To insults, I say, &quot;sticks and stones... names will never hurt you.&quot;  Distributors could earn the benefit of being dealt with civilly when they stop cheating people out of their money (translation: stop selling MonaVie)

Also just once it would be refreshing if distributors followed &lt;a href=&quot;http://monaviemediacenter.com/policies-and-procedures-updateâ€”social-media&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MonaVie own rules when posting on this website&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Distributors may post text and videos on Blogs, Social Networks, and Video Websites so long as he or she has passed our Compliance certification course.
   * All text postings must include the Distributor&#039;s name and ID number.&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How many postings have we had here that did not include a distributor name or an ID number?  Is it 99.9% or higher?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it really odd that distributors can scam people out of thousands a year, but can never seem stand few insults.  To insults, I say, &#8220;sticks and stones&#8230; names will never hurt you.&#8221;  Distributors could earn the benefit of being dealt with civilly when they stop cheating people out of their money (translation: stop selling MonaVie)</p>
<p>Also just once it would be refreshing if distributors followed <a href="http://monaviemediacenter.com/policies-and-procedures-updateâ€”social-media" rel="nofollow">MonaVie own rules when posting on this website</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Distributors may post text and videos on Blogs, Social Networks, and Video Websites so long as he or she has passed our Compliance certification course.<br />
   * All text postings must include the Distributor&#8217;s name and ID number.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>How many postings have we had here that did not include a distributor name or an ID number?  Is it 99.9% or higher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vogel</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5027</link>
		<dc:creator>Vogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5027</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve been proven wrong over and over again parasite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve been proven wrong over and over again parasite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IheartEMV</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5025</link>
		<dc:creator>IheartEMV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5025</guid>
		<description>I do believe that I have had some good points. I just can&#039;t stand the constant insults. If I&#039;m wrong, then prove me wrong, but do it in a civilized manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe that I have had some good points. I just can&#8217;t stand the constant insults. If I&#8217;m wrong, then prove me wrong, but do it in a civilized manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonaVie Scam</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5024</link>
		<dc:creator>MonaVie Scam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5024</guid>
		<description>That the first, most obvious way :-). There are others, but I won&#039;t go into them.

In the end, it doesn&#039;t matter who people pretend to be.  If they can make logical arguments that advance the discussion, we&#039;ll enjoy a lively debate.  If not, I&#039;ll moderate as necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the first, most obvious way :-). There are others, but I won&#8217;t go into them.</p>
<p>In the end, it doesn&#8217;t matter who people pretend to be.  If they can make logical arguments that advance the discussion, we&#8217;ll enjoy a lively debate.  If not, I&#8217;ll moderate as necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food Tech in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5023</link>
		<dc:creator>Food Tech in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5023</guid>
		<description>Maybe it was his wife with an opposing viewpoint?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it was his wife with an opposing viewpoint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IheartEMV</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5022</link>
		<dc:creator>IheartEMV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5022</guid>
		<description>Nice. Was curious how you go about knowing who the double posters are. Figured it had to be IP address. Guess I was right. Just having some fun...was pretty sure it would be caught.
Cheers guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. Was curious how you go about knowing who the double posters are. Figured it had to be IP address. Guess I was right. Just having some fun&#8230;was pretty sure it would be caught.<br />
Cheers guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonaVie Scam</title>
		<link>http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-emv-lite-now-with-less-energy/comment-page-2/#comment-5019</link>
		<dc:creator>MonaVie Scam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juicescam.com/?p=190#comment-5019</guid>
		<description>Actually, just noticed that IheartEMV decided to try to come back as a different person (this time seemingly on the anti-MonaVie side).  Also interesting is that he was came here nearly two weeks ago, left one comment, and then went away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, just noticed that IheartEMV decided to try to come back as a different person (this time seemingly on the anti-MonaVie side).  Also interesting is that he was came here nearly two weeks ago, left one comment, and then went away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

