Comments on: Market Value Doesn’t Apply to MonaVie

By: switch

switch — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 13:33:05 +0000

Either way of looking at it, “Truth” is teeing up on everyone else’s hard earned ca$h.

How does it feel shark?

By: Rasheed

Rasheed — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:28:07 +0000

Truth, you need to supply us with your name and distro ID.

And “substantial residual income?” Really? The IDS doesn’t seem to show that many people are making “substantial residual income.”

By: MonaVie Scam

MonaVie Scam — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:24:33 +0000

I had to read that a few times myself Vogel. I think he means he spends $350/mo. on the business which returns a substantial residual income. However, it was pretty vague.

By: Vogel

Vogel — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:19:58 +0000

Wow…an income of 4K a year…I spend more than that on coffee. How many lies did you have to tell for that 4K? Do you feel any better selling your sick grandma Monavie than you would if you just stole the money out of her purse?

By: Food Tech in CA

Food Tech in CA — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:03:14 +0000

Umm…are you the caddy?

By: The Truth

The Truth — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:30:30 +0000

not a great business opportunity?

$350/month for my own business, working minimal hours, and earning a substantial residual income.

9:00 am tee time tomorrow.

By: Kyle

Kyle — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:57:48 +0000

the obvious excuse for not distributing products in stores is “that’s not fair to the distributors who work hard” or “we want to keep the money for our hard working salesmen” or “that saves us money, so we can focus on production, not marketing”

All of which are bullshit. Since when did having WalMart carry your products COST anything? If there’s demand, there’s distributors BEGGING to sell your products. MLM is the opposite, there’s no demand so they need to BEG people to buy.